| Cordilleran Section - 101st Annual Meeting (April 29–May 1, 2005) | |
| Paper No. 36-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:20 AM-9:40 AM | ||
NEW HIGH-ACCURACY ZIRCON U-PB DATING METHOD: EXAMPLES FROM THE COAST RANGE OPHIOLITE (CRO) OF CALIFORNIA | ||
|
MATTINSON, James M., Geological Sciences, Univ of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9630, mattinson@geol.ucsb.edu. Recognition that ophiolites represent oceanic crustal assemblages spurred a burst of geochronological studies (K-Ar starting in the early 1970's, zircon U-Pb in the mid 1970's). U-Pb dating of zircon from plagiogranites quickly became a favored method, and many of these early U-Pb ages are still quoted. However, most of this early work was done by methods we would regard as primitive today. A new method, CA-TIMS (e.g., Mattinson, 2003, 2005), is particularly well suited for ophiolite dating. CA-TIMS pre-treats zircons by high-temperature annealing of natural radiation damage, followed by multi-step partial dissolution analysis. The annealing of radiation damage is a crucial step, and eliminates leaching effects that have hampered earlier multi-step zircon analyses. Early dissolution steps typically remove zircon domains that have lost Pb via natural discordance processes. Later steps sample “closed-system” zircon, yielding highly precise and accurate 206Pb*/238U “plateau ages” of igneous crystallization for zircons that lack any older inheritance (as is the case for most ophiolite zircons). For example, non-magnetic and slightly magnetic zircon fractions from Point Sal ophiolite plagiogranite yield ages of 165.28 ± 0.11 Ma and 165.25 ± 0.12 Ma, respectively. Plagiogranite zircons from the San Simeon ophiolite remnant yield a very similar age at 165.46 ± 0.12 Ma, supporting a correlation between the Pt. Sal and San Simeon remnants (Hall, 1975). In contrast, other CRO remnants are younger, e.g., Del Puerto/Red Mountain at 160.85 ± 0.09 Ma, or older, e.g., Paskenta at 167.80 ± 0.13 Ma. These new, high-accuracy ages, along with an improved Jurassic timescale (e.g., Palfy et al., 2000), allow a more detailed evaluation of CRO “plate stratigraphy” following Cliff Hopson (e.g., Hopson et al., 1996). For example, the new data require a depositional hiatus of 9±5 Ma between ophiolite formation and deposition of the immediately overlying volcano-pelagic sequence at Point Sal. | ||
|
Cordilleran Section - 101st Annual Meeting (April 29–May 1, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 36 Ophiolites, Batholiths, and Regional Geology I: A Session in Honor of Cliff Hopson Fairmont Hotel: Gold 8:00 AM-12:10 PM, Sunday, May 1, 2005 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 85 | ||
© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||