Cordilleran Section - 101st Annual Meeting (April 29–May 1, 2005)
Paper No. 12-4
Presentation Time: 2:20 PM-2:40 PM

CONFIDENTIALITY UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW

DAY, James M. Jr, Downey Brand, 555 Capitol Mall, 10th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814, jday@downeybrand.com.

Trade secrets are protected under California law even without a written confidentiality agreement under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) [California Civil Code (“CC”) S 3426 et seq.].

Under the UTSA, misappropriation occurs when a trade secret is acquired by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means, or when a trade secret is disclosed or used without consent by a person: (i) who used improper means to acquire it; (ii) who knew or should have known it was acquired improperly, acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain secrecy or limit its use, or derived from a person required to keep its secrecy or limit its use; or (iii) who knew or should have known that it was acquired by accident or mistake [CC S 3426.1(b)]. Remedies under the UTSA are damages and injunctive relief [CC SS 3426.2 and 3426.3]. If willful and malicious, the Court may award exemplary damages and attorneys fees in certain circumstances [CC S 3426.4].

Under UTSA a trade secret is, “information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances.” [CC S 3426.1(d)]

Should a written confidentiality agreement be entered into? In many instances, access to confidential data simply may not otherwise be had.

Advantages include: (i) the law of a particular jurisdiction may be selected; (ii) specific remedies may be selected such as specific performance and injunctive relief, and it may require attorneys fees be awarded to the prevailing party; (iii) identification of what is confidential; (iv) identifying which persons may view the information and how it must be treated and returned; (v) binding arbitration may be chosen; and (vi) it shows the claiming parties' effort to maintain confidentiality.

Disadvantages include: (i) it may be an unreasonable restrain on trade, especially when required as a condition of employment (time and geographic limitations must be included to avoid prohibiting highly trained individuals from being able to practice their trade); (ii) it may chill negotiations.

Cordilleran Section - 101st Annual Meeting (April 29–May 1, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 12
Application of New Technologies to Petroleum Reservoirs: Implications for Exploration and Production
Fairmont Hotel: Crystal
1:15 PM-5:20 PM, Friday, April 29, 2005

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 50

© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.