| Cordilleran Section - 101st Annual Meeting (April 29–May 1, 2005) | |
| Paper No. 4-7 | |
| Presentation Time: 11:40 AM-12:00 PM | ||
SPECULATIONS ON SIERRA NEVADA BATHOLITH EVOLUTION | ||
|
GLAZNER, Allen F.1, BARTLEY, John M.2, and OSKIN, Michael E.1, (1) Department of Geological Sciences, Univ of North Carolina, CB# 3315, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, afg@unc.edu, (2) Department of Geology and Geophysics, Univ of Utah, 135 S. 1460 E., Rm 719, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Batholiths are central components of the Earth's architecture because they signify crustal growth and recycling and commonly form strong, high-standing terrains that influence regional tectonics, surface processes, and climate. In spite of their important role in continental geology, however, several key aspects of batholith formation are poorly understood. This talk will summarize evidence pro and con for several conjectures about the evolution of the Sierra Nevada batholith (SNB), including: (1) The SNB probably never attained Andean crustal thickness (60+ km) because since the Jurassic it has resided on a windward margin subject to mid-latitude westerlies and consequent glacial and fluvial erosion. Great crustal thickness in the central Andes occurs at trade wind latitudes where erosion is minimal and volcanic cover can accumulate to great thickness. The southern Andes, where westerlies prevail and erosion may limit crustal thickness, is perhaps a more appropriate analog for the SNB. (2) The unbroken, high-standing nature of the SNB and other batholiths results from their large grain size. Field data commonly show that coarse-grained "weak" minerals (e.g., quartz) exhibit greater strength in shear zones than fine-grained "strong" minerals (e.g., plagioclase). Thus, the SNB may form the unbroken, high-standing, rain-capturing western boundary of the Basin and Range because of protracted cooling and consequent formation of large crystals. (3) Many plutons in the SNB were emplaced at roughly the same time as movement across nearby contractional shear zones, yet many modern arcs are extensional. The shear zones may record shortening during transient subduction of asperities on the downgoing slab, with the plutons themselves exploiting the shear zones during ensuing extension. (4) Mass balance of SNB magmas requires input of large amounts of continental lithospheric mantle supplied by antithetic subduction of the backarc. Rapid Late Cretaceous batholith growth coincided with large-magnitude backarc shortening in the Sevier belt. (5) Plutons in the SNB settled into the crust under the load of overlying plutons and volcanic rocks, displacing wall rocks laterally; mass balance in such systems is a fundamentally 3-dimensional problem that cannot be solved in map view. | ||
|
Cordilleran Section - 101st Annual Meeting (April 29–May 1, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 4 Plutons and Their Host Rocks in the Sierra Nevada Batholith: A Forum and Discussion on Magma Emplacement, Magmatic Differentiation, and Pluton Solidification Fairmont Hotel: Piedmont 8:15 AM-12:00 PM, Friday, April 29, 2005 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 39 | ||
© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||