| Northeastern Section - 40th Annual Meeting (March 14–16, 2005) | |
| Paper No. 8-1 | |
| Presentation Time: 1:00 PM-1:20 PM | ||
EROSION RATE OF THE APPALACHIAN PLATEAU IN THE VICINITY OF THE NEW RIVER GORGE, WEST VIRGINIA | ||
|
CLIFTON, Tom, Earth and Atmospheric Science, Purdue Univ, West, Lafayette, IN 47907, tclifton@purdue.edu and GRANGER, Darryl, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue Univ, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907 The New River splits the flat-topped Appalachian Plateau of West Virginia in a gorge up to 500 meters deep. This landscape is thought to result from the exceptional erosional resistance of the New River Formation sandstone, which locally caps the plateau. To test this hypothesis, we measured cosmogenic 10Be concentrations in sediment from streams that exclusively drain the New River Formation, as well as from soil on undisturbed hilltops. Because the New River Formation is an important source of coal, great care was taken to avoid watersheds impacted by mining or other development. Our results indicate that basin-averaged erosion rates range from 7-10 m/My, and that local hilltop erosion rates range from 4-11 m/My. These erosion rates are substantially slower than those measured elsewhere in the Appalachian Mountains, which tend to range from 20-40 m/My. Incision rates of the New River have been measured at multiple sites both upstream and downstream of our study area, yielding rates of approximately 30 m/My over the past 1-2 million years. These results suggest that the New River’s incision rate is in equilibrium with erosion rates in the Appalachian Mountains upstream of the gorge, and that the gorge has developed due to the erosional resistance of the New River formation. Although we cannot justifiably extrapolate our results to the past, if the incision rates and erosion rates of this study have remained constant, then the New River gorge could have formed over the past 20 million years. During the course of this project, we developed an improved method for separating quartz using heated rollers instead of the customary ultrasonic tank. We will present a brief comparison of these two methods. | ||
|
Northeastern Section - 40th Annual Meeting (March 14–16, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 8 Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and Paleontology Prime Hotel and Conference Center: Alydar/Citation Room 1:00 PM-3:20 PM, Monday, March 14, 2005 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 18 | ||
© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||