Southeastern Section - 54th Annual Meeting (March 17–18, 2005)
Paper No. 17-2
Presentation Time: 8:20 AM-8:40 AM

COMPARISON OF POROSITY DEVELOPMENT IN MODERN AND ANCIENT CARBONATE ROCKS

KIRKLAND, Brenda L.1, COFFEY, Melody R.2, CULPEPPER, Jonathan2, GOMEZ, Alfred D.3, KELLEY, Kristin N.2, IOAN, Lascu2, TAYLOR, Angela2, and WALKER, Lindsay2, (1) Geosciences, Mississippi State Univ, Mississippi State, 39762, kirkland@geosci.msstate.edu, (2) Geosciences, Mississippi State Univ, Mississippi State, MS 39762, (3) Chesapeake Energy, Oklahoma City, OK 73118, reverse_evolution@hotmail.com

This study compares porosity development in modern samples from Eluthera Island in the Bahamas and from the eastern coast of Yucatan, Mexico to Pennsylvanian core (Rattlesnake-142, 6692-6809 ft) from Rattlesnake Field in the San Juan Basin in northwestern New Mexico.

Allochem types and rock textures are remarkably similar. Modern biosparites, deposited as aeolianites, are dominated by ooids, peloids, and fragments of a variety of marine organisms including red algae, green algae, benthic foraminifera, mollusk fragments, and, more rarely, coral and echinoderms. Pennsylvanian biosparites and biomicrites, deposited on an open shelf, contain allochems that are of similar size, type, and pre-diagenesis mineralogy and include peloids, ooids, foraminifera, mollusk fragments, and chaetidids.

In the modern samples diagenesis has rapidly resulted in delicate dissolution of individual cortices in ooids, precipitation of meteoric cement, limited marine cement, and in some cases a clay mineral. Pore types in the modern samples include interparticle, intraparticle and vuggy. Diagenesis in the ancient samples is more extensive with partial dissolution and replacement of ooids, partial silicification of allochems and matrix, and filling of pore space with large, blocky late spar. Pore types include interparticle, intraparticle and vuggy with a large amount of porosity lost to late cementation. In the Rattlesnake-142 core, porosity is greatest in cycles interpreted as high stand deposits. Porosity development, particularly the large cavern systems in the modern rocks, is interpreted as forming in association with fresh water lens during sea level high stand.

Southeastern Section - 54th Annual Meeting (March 17–18, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 17--Booth# 0
Water/Rock Interactions in Carbonate Rock Systems: Karst, Paleokarst, and Other Implications
Bayview Hotel at the Grand Casino Resort: 8
8:00 AM-10:20 AM, Friday, March 18, 2005

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 2, p. 41

© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.