Southeastern Section - 54th Annual Meeting (March 17–18, 2005)
Paper No. 12-3
Presentation Time: 1:00 PM-5:00 PM

THE PETROGRAPHY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE SOUTH RIM FORMATION, BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK, TEXAS

BENKER, S. Christian1, WHITE, John Charles1, REN, Minghua2, URBANCZYK, Kevin3, and CORRICK, Donald W.4, (1) Earth Sciences, Eastern Kentucky Univ, Roark 103, 521 Lancaster Ave, Richmond, KY 40475, chris.benker@eku.edu, (2) Department of Geological Sciences, Univ of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Ave, El Paso, TX 79968, (3) Dept. of Earth & Physical Sciences, Geology, Sul Ross State Univ, Alpine, TX 79832, (4) Big Bend National Park, P.O. Box 129, Big Bend National Park, TX 79834

The South Rim Formation consists of metaluminous to peralkalic quartz trachyte, rhyolite, and high-silica rhyolite lavas, lava domes, ash-flow tuffs, and related intrusive rocks. These are the products of numerous volcanic vents that erupted about 33-32 Ma and 29-28 Ma throughout Big Bend National Park, Texas.

The Boot Rock and Pine Canyon Rhyolite Members range in SiO2 from 62 to 72%. Variation diagrams demonstrate distinct decreases in the major-element oxides, Sr, Ba, and Eu with increasing SiO2. These trends are consistent with fractional crystallization of an assemblage dominated by alkali feldspar; additional support for this model is supported by the abundance of euhedral alkali feldspars in all samples and by trace-element and major-element mass balance modeling.

The Burro Mesa Rhyolite and Emory Peak Rhyolite Members all have greater than 72% SiO2. For a given concentration of SiO2, the Burro Mesa Rhyolite is more strongly enriched in FeO, K2O, Rb, Y, Zr, Nb, and Th than the Emory Peak Rhyolite. Despite varying chemical trends, both of these rhyolites are petrographically similar, consisting of aphyric to alkali feldspar and quartz phyric comendite.

Based on the trace-element geochemistry, it is very unlikely that these high silica rhyolites evolved from the same quartz trachyte-rhyolite suite via fractional crystallization. These data in conjunction with the younger age for the Burro Mesa Rhyolite (28-29 Ma) suggest that this unit—although petrographically very similar—is not related to any other rocks in, and might be better excluded from, the South Rim Formation.

Southeastern Section - 54th Annual Meeting (March 17–18, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 12--Booth# 13
Petrology (Posters)
Bayview Hotel at the Grand Casino Resort: Grand Ballroom D
1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Thursday, March 17, 2005

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 2, p. 35

© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.