| 2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006) | |
| Paper No. 95-6 | |
| Presentation Time: 2:55 PM-3:10 PM | ||
FLUID FLOW AND REACTION KINETICS IN THE FORMATION OF MVT DEPOSITS | ||
|
ANDERSON, Greg, Geology, University of Toronto, Earth Sciences Building, 22 Russell St, Toronto, ON M5S 3B1, Canada, greg@geology.utoronto.ca and THOM, James, Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada A continuing problem in theories of Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) ore genesis is the origin of the sulfur in the ore minerals. Reduction of seawater sulfate to H2S is commonly called upon, but because ore formation temperatures are too high for bacterial reduction and thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) is believed to be too slow, TSR is generally held to occur before ore deposition, with the H2S held in a trap later intersected by a metal-bearing solution. Such mixing (the “mixing hypothesis”) should result in a high degree of supersaturation and hence fine-grained (e.g. colloform) textures, but the kinetics of the sulfate reduction reaction is not a genetic factor, and there are theoretically few limits to the amount of ore produced. Compilation of all available data, including some recent data of our own, shows that the overall TSR reaction has first order kinetics, and that at a typical MVT ore formation temperature of 150oC, the rate constant lies between 100 and 10-4 y-1, depending on experimental conditions. Data are not sufficient to establish the rate law, but it appears likely that the effects of pH and H2S concentration cancel, leaving the reaction pseudo-first order in sulfate concentration. To what extent these measured rate constants apply to natural conditions remains problematic for several reasons. An alternative to sulfate reduction is the release of H2S from organic material. Our data for the release of H2S from an organic-rich shale show that the process is zeroth order with a rate constant at 150oC in the same range. A simple “continously stirred tank reactor” flow model shows that rate constants in the upper part of this range and Darcy flow rates of 1-10 m/y could form ore deposits in 106 y but probably not in 104 y. However, 1D reactive transport modeling shows that with the larger rate constants at 1 m/y all the zinc will precipitate as sphalerite within a few meters in the flow path. This is not considered reasonable, so that in this sense the larger rate constants may be too fast. Although very slow, reaction rates for both processes are fast enough to generate small ore bodies, with H2S generation taking place during ore formation. The ore deposits of Central Tennessee have several features such as large, well formed sphalerites in relatively small deposits, which suggest that one (or both) of these processes may be responsible. | ||
|
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 95 Experimental Investigations into Hydrothermal Systems: Implications for Mass Transfer in the Earth’s Crust Pennsylvania Convention Center: 107 AB 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, 23 October 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 244 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||