2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
Paper No. 35-11
Presentation Time: 4:50 PM-5:10 PM

STENO'S PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND THE FOUNDATION OF GEOLOGY

HANSEN, Jens Morten, Management, GEUS, Geological Surrvey of Dednmark and Greenland, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark, Copenhagen DK-1350 Denmark, jmh@geus.dk

Nicolaus Steno's (1638-1686) reasoning has been shown to be similar to Karl Popper's revision the positivistic philosophy of science. Steno's ‘conjecture and refutation' arguments state: Similar things are produced in similar ways and in similar surroundings. Because natural processes can obliterate as well as preserve evidence, we must build scientific reasoning on conjecture and refutation.

Steno's studies of Tuscany had taught him that the Earth had undergone huge changes. But he realized that some might construe his ideas as contradicting Holy Scripture, and that no one could believe him unless his findings were based on incontrovertible logic and observation.

He knew that Nature speaks with one voice – what Lyell later restated as the ‘Actualistic Principle', and that there were specific prerequisites for understanding geological phenomena. These he defines as types of natural motion: (1) Change in location, (2) Liquid or gaseous flow and, (3) diffusion (unknown until Steno's doctoral thesis, De Thermis, was rediscovered in Philadelphia in 1969). In addition, he defined growth as surface phenomena common to all solids including sediments, crystals and living organisms.

These made it possible for Steno to formulate the principles that earned him fame: original horizontality, lateral continuity, and order of superposition. In addition, Steno deserves credit for acknowledging the principle of cross cutting relationships (generally attributed to Hutton), and the principle of reconstruction (geologic history is a series of causes and effects known by stripping strata back from youngest to oldest).

Steno's name was nearly forgotten after his death due in part to his religious conversion. Leibniz appealed in vain to Steno to return to science from his positions as priest and bishop. To his death Steno considered scientific knowledge to be the highest praise to God and he insisted that religious speculations could never have authority above scientific arguments!

2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 35
From the Scientific Revolution to the Enlightenment: Emergence of Modern Geology and Evolutionary Thought from the 16th–18th Century II
Pennsylvania Convention Center: 204 B
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 22 October 2006

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 100

© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.