2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
Paper No. 10-5
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-9:15 AM

GEOMORPHOLOGY OF NON-ENGINEERED VERSUS ENGINEERED SHORES OF YELLOWSTONE LAKE, YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK

DENNIS, John C., Environmental Dynamics Program, University of Arkansas, 113 Ozark Hall, Fayetteville, AR 72701, jdennis@uark.edu and BOSS, Stephen K., Dept. of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, 113 Ozark Hall, Fayetteville, AR 72701

Geomorphic differences between non-engineered and engineered segments of the Yellowstone Lake shore were quantified from shore profiles acquired using precision laser surveying equipment, nearshore high-resolution bathymetry acquired from dual frequency echo sounder data, and beach texture derived from sediment grain size analyses. Results from an initial survey conducted in July-August 2005 established that there are significant geomorphic differences between non-engineered and engineered shore segments of Yellowstone Lake. Visual observations and surveyed shore profiles show non-engineered shore segments display relatively wide beaches composed of sand to fine gravel with gently sloping, concave-up shore profiles. Engineered shores typically display narrow or non-existent beaches, coarse sediment texture (gravel to coarse gravel), with steep upper (landward) profiles associated with shore protection structures and flat lower (offshore) profiles. Thus, engineered segments of the Yellowstone Lake shore exhibit morphological features similar to those associated with hard stabilization of marine and Great Lakes coastal settings and are suggestive of enhanced erosion and shore degradation at engineered shore sites when compared to adjacent non-engineered shore segments. Ongoing monitoring and repeat annual surveys of study sites will record evolution of shore segments in response to shore armoring, including evolution of the recently engineered shore of Mary Bay (northeast shore of Yellowstone Lake) while providing enhanced understanding of shore zone processes at Yellowstone Lake. Results from this study may also aid in developing alternative strategies for protecting lakeside infrastructure while at the same time conserving lakeshore resources and preserving the quality of visitor experiences at Yellowstone Lake.

2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 10
Geology in the National Parks: Research, Mapping, and Resource Management
Pennsylvania Convention Center: 110 AB
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Sunday, 22 October 2006

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 35

© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.