| 2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006) | |
| Paper No. 71-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:50 AM-9:10 AM | ||
A GEOMORPHIC CONCEPTUAL MODEL IS A NECESSARY FIRST STEP IN NATURALISTIC CHANNEL DESIGN | ||
|
PIZZUTO, Jim, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, pizzuto@udel.edu Specifying the geometry of a river channel, given relevant values of controlling parameters, is a classic problem in fluvial geomorphology and river mechanics that has resisted solution despite more than a century of focused scientific study. This implies that “naturalistic channel design” for restoring rivers is founded on an incomplete scientific understanding. Fortunately, the goal of engineering is to satisfy design objectives, not to achieve or implement scientific understanding. However, if restoration cannot be completely guided by scientific principles, how can the science of geomorphology support river restoration design? The answer to this question follows immediately from the observation that any restoration design requires, as a fundamental initial step, an understanding of the fluvial system to be restored. For rivers, this understanding involves defining a stream's history, morphology, and relevant processes, and integrating this information into a thorough conceptual model of river channel behavior. While geomorphic models are often qualitative and insufficient by themselves to solve site specific design problems, the science of geomorphology provides objective and well developed methods for developing profound conceptual understanding of fluvial systems. Conceptual models of fluvial systems may be typically applied regionally, so geomorphic models do not necessarily need to be developed for each particular restoration site. Unfortunately, many restoration designs are based on conceptual models that were popular decades ago, and that have been supplanted by recent scientific advances. Furthermore, informative conceptual models of fluvial systems (particularly those with a strong historical, stratigraphic basis) require sophisticated geomorphic training. Geomorphologists, rather than apologizing for their inability to design restored rivers, should focus on their strongest achievement: established methods that allow a river's history, morphology, and relevant processes to be encapsulated in regionally valid conceptual models. | ||
|
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 71 Watershed-based Approaches to River Restoration Pennsylvania Convention Center: 113 A 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 23 October 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 187 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||