| 2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006) | |
| Paper No. 65-11 | |
| Presentation Time: 10:30 AM-10:45 AM | ||
GLOBAL CONTROLS ON EROSION RATES: THE AHNERT CURVE, PRECIPITATION, AND LAND USE | ||
|
MONTGOMERY, David R., Department of Earth and Space Sciences and Quaternary Research Center, Univ of Washington, Box 351310, Seattle, WA 98195, dave@ess.washington.edu and BRANDON, Mark, Dept of Geology and Geophysics, Yale Univ, PO Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109 The functional controls on erosion rates are central to understanding both controls on global sediment flux and the potential for feedback between tectonics, climate, and erosion in shaping topography. Frank Ahnert's seminal 1970 paper reported a strong relationship between erosion rate and mean local relief, and over the past decade the relationship between erosion rate and hillslope gradient has come to be considered highly non-linear in steep terrain, resulting in the development of threshold slopes that adjust to spatial (and temporal) variations in rock uplift rate through variability in landslide frequency rather than steepness. Analysis of a high-resolution (10-m grid) DEM transect across the convergent orogen of the Olympic Mountains reveals a non-linear relation between long-term erosion rates and mean slope, consistent with the concept of hillslope evolution by landsliding in steep terrain. The DEM data also reveal a relation between mean slope and mean local relief. Coarser-scale (1-km grid) global analysis of the relation between erosion rate and mean local relief reveals different trends for areas with low erosion rates and tectonically active mountain ranges, with the composite relation being well described by non-linear models. Superimposed on topographically-mediated influences on erosion rates are variations in precipitation rates strongly influence erosion rates. Lastly, variations in erodibility driven by land use account for greater variability in local erosion rates than do topography and climate. While interactions among all three factors (topography, climate, and land use) complicate assessing global patterns of erosion, the interactions provide a rich target for geomorphological study. | ||
|
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 65 Erosion: Processes, Rates, and New Measuring Techniques Pennsylvania Convention Center: Auditorium Lecture Hall 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 23 October 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 175 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||