| 2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006) | |
| Paper No. 64-14 | |
| Presentation Time: 11:30 AM-11:45 AM | ||
THE ROLE OF SIZE FOR THE POTENTIAL PHYSIOLOGY OF EARLY COOKSONIA-LIKE VASCULAR PLANT RELATIVES | ||
|
BOYCE, C. Kevin, Geophysical Sciences, Univ of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, ckboyce@uchicago.edu Because of their fragmentary preservation, the earliest cooksonioid terrestrial plant macrofossils largely have served as markers for the accumulation of vascular plant characteristics--stomata, sterome, vasculature--while younger Devonian fossils with complete anatomical preservation and documented gametophytes have received greater attention concerning the early evolution of vascular plants and the alternation of generations. Despite preservational deficits, however, possible physiologies of cooksonioid fossils can be constrained by considering the (preserved) overall axis size in conjunction with the potential range of (unpreserved) cell types and sizes, given that the lack of organ differentiation requires all plant functions be performed by the same axis. Once desiccation resistance, support, and transport functions are taken into account, there is simply not volume enough left over for photosynthesis in the smaller fossils, argument for physiological dependence on an unpreserved gametophyte. Various bryophyte innovations that facilitate small size would have been unavailable for these plants, furthering the size discrepancy. Also, the presence of a sterome--a link to vascular plants, but strictly unnecessary in such small organisms--would actively limit photosynthetic potential. As in many mosses, axial anatomy more likely ensured continued spore dispersal despite desiccation and death of the sporophyte rather than photosynthetic independence. Suppositions concerning size constraints are supported by comparisons to the size range of Early Devonian plants with physiological independence demonstrable through rhizomatous growth or preserved rooting structures. Size is rarely considered in a taxonomic or systematic context, so that several genera and even individual species which are key to our understanding of the radiation of vascular plants actually lump together fossils that can range over an order of magnitude in axis diameter--spanning sizes from necessary physiological dependence to potential photosynthetic competence. Either current phylogenetic understanding must be revised or the possibility must be considered that an independent sporophyte evolved more than once among vascular plants. | ||
|
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 64 Paleontology/Paleobotany III: Morphospace and Morphological Patterns Pennsylvania Convention Center: 107 AB 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 23 October 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 173 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||