| 2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006) | |
| Paper No. 69-6 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:25 AM-9:45 AM | ||
CONODONT APATITE: A GEOCHEMICAL AND ISOTOPIC TIME CAPSULE OF THE PALEOCEAN? | ||
|
EMSBO, Poul, U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 973, Denver, CO 80225, pemsbo@usgs.gov, BREIT, George, US Geol Survey, PO Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225-0046, KOENIG, Alan E., U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, Denver, 80225, LOWERS, Heather A., U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, 80225, PREMO, Wayne R., U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 963, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, and HARRIS, Anita G., 1523 East Hillsboro Blvd #1031, Deerfield Beach, FL 33441 Interest in the chemical evolution of the paleocean has increased the search for minerals that reliably record chemical/isotopic composition of the ancient ocean. Conodont apatite has long been considered because of its low chemical reactivity and high concentration of elements suitable for isotope analyses. Nonetheless, the interpretation of conodont composition has been limited by uncertainty: Are chemical elements primary (in vivo) or incorporated as a result of postmortem recrystallization/exchange on the seafloor and during diagenesis? We attempt to reduce this uncertainty by thorough characterization of conodonts of different ages and thermal maturities using petrographic, (optical, SEM, CL), microanalytical (laser ablation ICP-MS, microprobe), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and isotopic (Sr, Pb, Nd) analyses. Differences in crystallinity and chemical composition among morphologic phases of conodont elements are most simply explained as primary differences. Conodonts exposed to saline depositional waters or temperatures > 300˚ C (CAI 5) are excluded because of visible recrystallization. XRD of white and hyaline matter display well ordered, highly crystalline apatite patterns. Basal plates, however, are significantly less crystalline and similar to other biogenic/sedimentary apatite. Systematic chemical differences in Sr, transition, and REE elements between hyaline and white apatite and fine-scale chemical zoning within single elements are believed to reflect biologic growth. Moreover, the absence of chemical zoning from core to rim or around natural internal porosity in conodonts suggests elements were not introduced postmortem. Variance in some samples can be shown to result from mixing of conodonts that are coeval with sedimentation and mechanically reworked older conodonts. Compositional changes between samples collected within 5 cm of vertical section emphasize the need for thin sample intervals. Distinct chemical and isotopic signatures contained in reworked conodonts and closely spaced samples, despite having undergone identical diagenetic histories, suggests retention of primary chemical composition. Taken together this evidence suggests that careful characterization of conodont apatite permits robust interpretations of paleocean chemical compositions. | ||
|
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 69 An Appetite for Apatite: Conodont-Based Geological Investigations in the 21st Century Pennsylvania Convention Center: 104 B 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 23 October 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 183 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||