| 2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006) | |
| Paper No. 183-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:45 AM-9:00 AM | ||
PHENOCRYST SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF LATE-ERUPTED BISHOP TUFF | ||
|
PAMUKCU, Ayla, GUALDA, Guilherme A.R., and ANDERSON, Alfred T. Jr, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, ayla@uchicago.edu In this study, we present crystal size distributions of late-erupted Bishop Tuff obtained using x-ray tomography. Crystal size distributions are important in that they bear on our understanding of crystal nucleation, growth, and fragmentation history. We compare crystal size distributions in late-erupted pumice clasts with those previously determined for early-erupted pumice clasts. X-ray tomography provides 3D images of whole pumice clasts, including fragmented but still articulated crystals. Five pumice clasts of late-erupted Bishop Tuff were studied and their bulk densities range from 0.42-1.18 g/cm3. Because spatial resolution increases as cylinder size decreases in our tomographic datasets, five cylinders of varying diameter were cut to allow determination of distributions over a broad range of crystal sizes (from 8.75-1120 μm). Crystal sizes were determined by image processing using Blob3D. For each mineral or mineral group in a clast, one crystal size distribution was computed by combining data from all five cylinders. Our data comprise crystal size distributions for magnetite, biotite + pyroxene, and quartz + sanidine. Overall, despite a range in clast bulk density and crystal contents, crystal size distributions for all five clasts are strikingly similar to each other, particularly for magnetite. In comparison with early-erupted crystal size distributions, however, late-erupted distributions show larger population densities. In all late-erupted distributions, semi-logarithmic plots show a concave-upward trend. These plots can be well-approximated by power law (fractal) distributions, which are consistent with fragmentation. It is surprising to see this relationship for late-erupted magnetite as early-erupted clasts and our tomographic images show unfragmented crystals. This suggests that fractal size distributions may not only be formed by fragmentation and can be magmatic in origin. | ||
|
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 183 Petrology, Igneous Pennsylvania Convention Center: 112 B 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, 25 October 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 446 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||