| 102nd Annual Meeting of the Cordilleran Section, GSA, 81st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Section, AAPG, and the Western Regional Meeting of the Alaska Section, SPE (8–10 May 2006) | |
| Paper No. 22-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 2:30 PM-3:00 PM | ||
OPTIMUM SELECTION OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEM FOR IRANIAN HEAVY OIL FIELDS | ||
|
TAHERI, Amir, IOR Research Institute, Iran, ataheri81@yahoo.com and HOOSHMANDKOOCHI, Ali, Iran Kuh E Mond as the first priority of heavy oil prospect in Iran is located in southwest of Iran and 80 km southeastern of Boushehr, one of the important Iranian ports in Persian Gulf coasts. Well MD 6 was spudded on September 19, 1984 for confirmation of the heavy oil occurrence in Asmari Jahrum formation and Bangestan group in Kuh E Mond structure. Black tarry oil with gravity of 13 API degree occurred in the samples through most of the Sarvak limestone. Because there were no development programs in this field, the well was secured and the rig was released on May 5, 1985. The field was put on the development program on early 1999. The MD 6 well was opened and the static oil level in the well was 400 m below surface. Clearly, some sort of artificial lift was needed in order to flow the well and restore the production rate to the normal levels and to maximize the ultimate recovery. The decision of which artificial lift method to use is very important to the long term profitability of the field. An improper selection of artificial lift can reduce production and increase the operating cost substantially. Once a decision has been made on the type to install on a well, it can be rarely altered whether or not the method selected was and still is the optimal for the existing conditions. This paper presents the screening criteria on the different artificial lift techniques and discusses why the choice were confined to PCP as the most suitable techniques to be applied in this well. The paper studies the technical consideration behind each method of artificial lift for this well (Beam Pump, ESP, PCP, Gas Lift and Hydraulic Lift) and the technical discussions for selecting PCP. | ||
|
102nd Annual Meeting of the Cordilleran Section, GSA, 81st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Section, AAPG, and the Western Regional Meeting of the Alaska Section, SPE (8–10 May 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 22 SPE: Production Optimization & Artificial Lift Anchorage Hilton Hotel: Birch/Willow 1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Tuesday, 9 May 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 5, p. 33 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||