| North-Central Section–40th Annual Meeting (20–21 April 2006) | |
| Paper No. 18-10 | |
| Presentation Time: 4:40 PM-5:00 PM | ||
UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCES: INTEGRATION INTO EXISTING CLASSES | ||
|
PERG, Lesley A., National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics and Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Univ of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 310 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, lperg@umn.edu and JENNINGS, Carrie E., Minnesota Geological Survey, Univ of Minnesota, 2642 University Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55114 Research is increasingly expected in graduate school applications, and training in analytical techniques makes students more employable. Undergraduate research typically takes the form of a separate summer class, or independent study during the semester. This system works well for those already planning on graduate study. Undecided students, and those that need to work to support their studies, are less likely to take advantage of separate research experiences not included in the core curriculum. Integrating a large-scale research project into an existing course has the advantage of reaching a broader cross-section of students. Our Glacial Geology class has the advantage of a Friday afternoon laboratory period, which historically facilitated 2-3 afternoon fieldtrips and 2 overnight (1.5 day) fieldtrips. Past classes required a final project, which included 3-4 laboratory periods for preparation and a 10-minute class presentation. Typical projects were predominantly researched papers; about 20% were field or experimental projects. We obtained a grant from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for a class project to determine the source of high sediment loads in the Minnesota River. This pilot project had the goals of characterizing the two possible sources, topsoil erosion in the flat uplands and bluff erosion in the deeply incised rivers, and applying the results to a sediment core from a cutoff meander of the Minnesota River. Our group organization: 3 groups of 4-5 students, with each member managing one aspect (sampling, laboratory work, background research, or presentation). One field trip was replaced with a sampling trip. Together the students visited the three field sites, and split into groups to sample: 1) soil samples in the Beauford Watershed, 2) bluff samples from the incised Le Seur tributary, 3) lake core from the Kasota Pond. Two laboratory periods were spent visiting the Limnological Core Research lab and the St. Croix Watershed research station, and 3 laboratory periods were used for independent group work. Four lecture periods were used for project discussion, group organization, post-fieldwork presentations, and final presentations. Final products included background research, field notes, sample characterization, and 2-3 analytical techniques. Future classes will include additional emphasis on laboratory and field notes as research products. | ||
|
North-Central Section–40th Annual Meeting (20–21 April 2006)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 18 Issues in Geoscience Education Student Center, University of Akron: Ballroom D 1:20 PM-5:40 PM, Thursday, 20 April 2006 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 4, p. 25 | ||
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||