Southeastern Section–55th Annual Meeting (23–24 March 2006)
Paper No. 6-1
Presentation Time: 8:05 AM-8:25 AM

AFFECTS OF GEOLOGIC CONTROLS ON GROUND-WATER FLOW – CHARACTERIZATION USING RESULTS FROM AGE-DATING METHODS ALONG TOPOGRAPHIC TRANSECTS IN REGOLITH-FRACTURED BEDROCK GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS IN NORTH CAROLINA

CHAPMAN, Melinda J., U.S. Geological Survey, 3916 Sunset Ridge Rd, Raleigh, NC 27607, mjchap@usgs.gov, SCHLEGEL, Melissa, 856E 620N, Provo, UT 84606, HUFFMAN, Brad A., U.S. Geological Survey, 44-Buck Shoals Rd, Suite A-2, Arden, NC 28704-3307, GEDDES, Donald J., NCDENR-DWQ Groundwater Section, 585 Waughtown St, Winston-Salem, NC 27107, and HORTON, J. Wright Jr, U.S. Geol Survey, 926A National Center, Reston, VA 20192

Age-dating methods, total tritium (3H), chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's), and tritium/helium (3H/3He), were applied at four ground-water research sites in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Physiographic Provinces in North Carolina to characterize ground-water flow and geologic controls along topographic transects in the regolith-fractured bedrock aquifer system. At all four sites, ground water in the shallow regolith and deeper bedrock is older in discharge areas (near streams) compared to ground water in recharge areas at various points along transects from the topographic high to mid-slope. Older ground water in discharge areas indicates longer flow paths. Shallow ground water in the regolith appears to be a mixture of modern water and older water recharged 10 to 15 years ago. The age of deeper ground water in the bedrock ranges from about 25 to nearly 60 years. The bedrock water has low tritium values, indicating the lack of recharge since the post-1960s hydrogen bomb testing period. Additionally, as expected from the conceptual ground-water-flow model, ground water at depth in the bedrock is older than the shallower ground water in the overlying regolith, likely a result of reduced infiltration of recharge through secondary and commonly discontinuous fracture networks in the bedrock. Ground water in recharge areas is younger at greater depths in the bedrock, whereas ground water in discharge areas is older, even in the shallow regolith.

Geologic controls on ground-water flow were evaluated at one site in the Piedmont. Results from a topographic well transect (high to low elevations) along the dip-slope of foliation in the same lithologic unit indicate the presence of younger ground water throughout except in the the discharge area. Conversely, results from wells drilled along the cut-slope (crossing foliation dip and several lithologic units) indicate the presence of older ground water in the mid-slope and discharge areas.

Southeastern Section–55th Annual Meeting (23–24 March 2006)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 6
Geology and Ground Water Resources in Carbonate and Crystalline Rocks of the Eastern U.S.: Methods, Geologic Controls, and Exploration Approaches
Marriott Hotel: Alvin York
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Thursday, 23 March 2006

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 3, p. 11

© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.