2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
Paper No. 116-5
Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM

THERMAL PROPERTIES OF ROCKS FROM THE BOREHOLE EYREVILLE-B, CHESAPEAKE PENINSULA PRELIMINARY DATA

POPOV, Yuri1, KOROBKOV, Dmitriy1, ROMUSHKEVICH, Raisa1, GOROBTSOV, Denis1, BURKHARDT, Hans2, MAYR, Sibylle2, and WILHELM, Helmut3, (1) Technical physics and rocks physics, Russian State Geological Prospecting University, Miklukho-Maklai str., 23, Moscow, 117997, Russia, yupopov@dol.ru, (2) Geophysikalisches Institut, TU Berlin, Berlin, 13355, Germany, (3) Geophysikalisches Institut, Universitaet Karlsruhe, Hertzstrasse 16, Karlsruhe, 76187, Germany

Thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, volumetric heat capacity, density and porosity were determined on 330 dry and water-saturated cores from the scientific well Eyreville-B. Non-destructive non-contact optical scanning technology was used for the thermal property measurements taking rock's thermal anisotropy and inhomogeneity into account. Porosity ranges from 0.2 to 67%. Thermal conductivity and diffusivity ranges were determined correspondingly as 0.16 to 4.76 W•m-1•K-1 and (0.14 to 3.90)•10-6 m2•s-1 for dry samples and 0.56 to 5.38 W•m-1•K-1 and (0.40 to 3.40)•10-6 m2•s-1 for water-saturated samples. Thermal anisotropy coefficient reaches 5 for dry samples and 2.7 for water-saturated samples. In most cases anisotropy was found to be caused by rock fracturing. Vertical variations of thermal properties along the well are significant (up to 50% relatively average values often) even within short intervals of depth (10-15 m) for depth interval of 1375-1762 m. Within a depth interval of 360-1090 m thermal properties are more stable. Six depth intervals in the formation can be distinguished on rock's thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity values: 132-195 m, 213-350 m, 352-1094 m, 1099-1256 m, 1268-1368 m and from 1373 m to the well bottom. Variations in thermal properties at water-saturation are quite different within different depth intervals. For thermal conductivity the variations depend on porosity, fractures and on mineral content. Thermal heterogeneity (estimated from thermal conductivity variations within every core) is significant in most cases and reaches 20-40%.

2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 116
The Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure: Results from the 2005–2006 ICDP-USGS Deep Drilling Project (Posters)
Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall E/F
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, 29 October 2007

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 313

© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.