| 2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007) | |
| Paper No. 201-2 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:25 AM-8:40 AM | ||
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CURVED SEGMENTS OF THE US APPALACHIANS: A COMPARISON OF THE PENNSYLVANIA AND TENNESSEE SALIENTS | ||
|
HNAT, James S., Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, 2534 CC Little Bldg, 1100 N University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, jhnat@umich.edu, VAN DER PLUIJM, Ben A., Geological Sciences/Environment, University of Michigan, 1100 N University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1005, and VAN DER VOO, Rob, Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 It has long been suggested that the sinuous trend of the Appalachian thrust belt reflects preexisting margin irregularities and associated depositional facies distributions (Thomas, 1977). However, the manner in which these curved segments formed is still a topic of debate, particularly with regard to rotations. Here we compare results from the Pennsylvania and Tennessee salients, both of which exhibit a curvature of ~60°. Primary paleomagnetic directions from redbeds in the Pennsylvania salient revealed a clockwise rotation of the northern limb of the salient relative to the southern limb. Structural data, including recent calcite twinning analysis, support this hypothesis. However, secondary magnetizations in redbeds and carbonate rocks in Pennsylvania were acquired after these rotations took place, since they do not show significant declination deviations. New paleomagnetic data from redbed units of the Tennessee salient, including the Cambrian Rome and the Silurian Red Mountain formations, were obtained. Paleomagnetic analysis of three sites in the Red Mountain Formation along the southern limb of the Tennessee salient (strike ~10°) reveals a prefolding, characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) that is statistically indistinguishable from Red Mountain ChRM's of previous workers from the adjacent Alabama recess (strike ~45°). Additionally, twenty sites were collected in the Rome Formation along the salient. Whereas the data show some scatter, no significant correlation of declination with regional strike is observed along the curved front of the Tennessee salient. Both the Red Mountain and Rome formations are likely secondary magnetizations of Carboniferous-Permian age. In contrast, calcite twinning analysis from limestone samples along the salient display a systematically fanned distribution of paleostress orientations, similar to the Pennsylvania salient. Thus, the paleomagnetic declination patterns in the Tennessee salient preclude late Paleozoic rotations, but permit earlier rotation as indicated by calcite twinning orientations; this is remarkably analogous to the scenario of the Pennsylvania salient. | ||
|
2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 201 Evolution of Appalachian-Ouachita Salients and Recesses from Reentrants [Embayments] and Promontories in the Continental Margin I: Thirtieth Anniversary Celebration of Advances Derived from Bill Thomas’ 1977 American Journal of Science Paper Colorado Convention Center: 401/402 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 538 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||