2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
Paper No. 9-1
Presentation Time: 8:05 AM-8:20 AM

EVALUATING SEDIMENT SOURCES, STORAGE, AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS IN THE AGRICULTURAL LE SUEUR RIVER WATERSHED, CENTRAL MINNESOTA

GRAN, Karen B.1, DAY, Stephanie2, JENNINGS, Carrie3, JOHNSON, Andrea1, LAUER, J. Wesley4, PARKER, Gary5, PERG, Lesley2, and WILCOCK, Peter R.6, (1) Geological Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1114 Kirby Dr, Duluth, MN 55812, kgran@umn.edu, (2) National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics, University of Minnesota, 2 - 3rd Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, (3) Minnesota Geological Survey, 2462 University Ave. W, St. Paul, MN 55114, (4) Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seattle University, Engineering Building - Room 522, Seattle University, Seattle, WA 98122, (5) Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Dept. of Geology and NCED, University of Illinois, 205 N Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, (6) Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering and NCED, Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 21218

We are creating a sediment budget for the Le Sueur River, a tributary to the Minnesota River that delivers 31% of the sediment load with only 7% of land area in the Middle Minnesota watershed. The Le Sueur carries a flow weighted mean concentration of 349 mg/l of suspended solids, far exceeding the standard of 58 mg/l which serves as a surrogate for turbidity (Data from the Water Resources Center, MN State University, Mankato). This watershed has a long history of cooperative monitoring by state agencies (MPCA, DNR, and MDA), federal agencies (USGS) and the Water Resources Center at MN State University. Our work builds on that of these groups and is being funded by the MPCA through state Clean Water Legacy funding.

The Le Sueur River flows into the incised Minnesota River valley, with knickpoints migrating up into low-gradient agricultural uplands. Primary sediment sources include uplands, ravines, high bluffs downstream of knickpoints, and streambanks. Our sediment budget is based on two parallel approaches: 1) a cosmogenic and fallout radionuclide budget to apportion sediment by sources, and 2) a physical sediment budget utilizing repeat surveys of bluffs and ravines, long-term history of meander migration, areas and ages of flood plains, channel geometry, and sediment gaging data. These data will inform models of sediment movement in and out of storage along the channel bed and floodplain.

Understanding sediment sources helps decision-makers identify potential management actions; however, actual policy implementation requires consideration of socioeconomic issues. Parallel projects by NCED social scientists include surveys to determine public preference and willingness to pay for management practices. They are also developing a decision-making analysis model that incorporates uncertainties in the science and in predicted outcomes of “best management practices” to iteratively determine the best and most economic approaches for managing sediment loads.

2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 9
Management and Restoration of Fluvial Systems with Broad Historical Changes and Human Impacts I
Colorado Convention Center: 407
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Sunday, 28 October 2007

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 32
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.