2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
Paper No. 212-13
Presentation Time: 4:45 PM-5:00 PM

MICRO-AND MACROSCALE INVESTIGATIONS OF CHROMATE SORPTION ON BARITE: IMPLICATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES TOWARD CHROMIUM IMMOBILIZATION

BOSE, Sweta and HIGGINS, Steven R., Department of Chemistry (Environmental Sciences PhD Program), Wright State Univ, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH 45435, bose.2@wright.edu

As an environmental pollutant, Cr (VI) necessitates remediation if detected at sufficiently high concentrations. Cr (VI) cleanup often involves reduction to Cr (III); however, alternative immobilization methods such as sorption of chromate on barite may be more effective in some circumstances. Understanding the Cr (VI) immobilization strategy includes micro and macro scale investigations through laboratory experiments by atomic force microscopy (AFM), mixed flow reactor (MFR) and plug flow reactor (PFR) systems. As an initial investigation into the processes, AFM experiments were carried out on freshly cleaved barite (001) surfaces exposed to aqueous solutions at pH = 8.4 and 70°C under constant flow through conditions. The presence of CrO42- in solutions inhibited dissolution at step edges and subsequently changed the etch pit morphology. A significant effect on the barite dissolution rate was noted at CrO42- concentration as low as 0.001M. The substrate dissolution rates were similar when barite surfaces were exposed to solutions of identical saturation state with respect to barite and hashemite (BaCrO4) phases, further suggesting an effect of aqueous CrO42- on barite dissolution. To extend the microscopic approach to larger scales, bulk powder suspensions of barite were studied in MFRs under similar conditions at 25°C. Experiments at different [CrO42-] revealed the inhibitory action of CrO42- on barite dissolution. Observations from these experiments suggest CrO42- sorption at step edges, further implying that barite could serve as a possible sorbent in contaminated ground waters. The feasibility of this technique will be discussed in light of PFR experiment results.

2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 212
Environmental Geoscience; Geology and Health; Public Policy
Colorado Convention Center: 505
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, 31 October 2007

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 577

© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.