| 2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007) | |
| Paper No. 132-2 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:15 AM-8:30 AM | ||
GEOCHEMISTRY OF MAGMATIC NI-CU-PGE DEPOSITS | ||
|
LESHER, C. Michael, Department of Earth Sciences and Mineral Exploration Research Centre, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON P3E2C6 Canada, mlesher@laurentian.ca Much of our understanding of the petrogenesis of magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE ores is based on a very limited range of elements. Utilization of a wider range of major (S, Fe, Ni, Cu), minor (Cr, Co, Zn), and trace (Au, Pd, Pt, Rh, Ru, Ir, Os, Pb, Ag, Cd, Hg, Se, Te, Tl, As, Sb, Bi, Mo, Sn, W) elements, which behave differently during mantle melting, magma crystallization, sulfide segregation, sulfide crystallization, metamorphic modification, and hydrothermal modification, provides better constraints on ore genesis. Differences in behaviour are most evident when normalized to abundances in primitive mantle and plotted in order of increasing compatibility during partial melting, rather than in order of melting point with Ni and Cu arbitrarily added to each end of the plots, as normally done. When plotted this way, bulk ore composites, mill feeds, and many disseminated ores exhibit relatively smooth patterns, indicating that they have sampled original magmatic compositions, whereas grab samples, most massive, semi-massive, and breccia ores, and veins do not, indicating that they represent variably modified magmatic compositions. When the bulk compositions of the world's major ore deposits are plotted this way, they define 3 major groups: Group I deposits (e.g., Noril'sk, Sudbury, Duluth, Thompson, Mt. Keith, Kambalda, Perseverance, and Raglan) exhibit slightly to moderately fractionated, but relatively smooth patterns, with the degree of fractionation decreasing with the MgO content of the parental magma. Group II deposits (e.g., Jinchuan, Pechenga, and Voisey's Bay) are depleted in PGE relative to Cu-Ni-Co, a signature of a low magma:sulfide ratio (R factor). Group III deposits (e.g., UG-2, Merensky Reef, and Plat Reef, Great Dyke, and Stillwater) are enriched in PGE, a signature of a high R factor, but are less enriched in Cu and Ni, supporting suggestions that the parental magmas were anomalously enriched in PGE. Variations in the abundances of other metals, semi-metals, and volatile metals of similar primary compatibility are superimposed on these patterns and reflect the influence of late-post magmatic processes, including MSS fractionation, hydrothermal mobilization, and tectonometamorphic mobilization. | ||
|
2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 132 Magmatic Nickel Sulfide Deposits: Geology, Geochemistry, and Genesis Colorado Convention Center: 504 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 358 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||