2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
Paper No. 36-5
Presentation Time: 2:30 PM-2:45 PM

THE EFFECT OF AS, CO, AND NI IMPURITIES ON PYRITE OXIDATION KINETICS:BATCH AND FLOW-THROUGH REACTOR EXPERIMENTS WITH SYNTHETIC PYRITE

LEHNER, Stephen, Earth and Environmental Science, Vanderbilt University, 5717 Stevenson Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37235, stephen.w.lehner@vanderbilt.edu and SAVAGE, Kaye, Earth and Environmental Science, Vanderbilt University, 5717 Stevenson Center Drive, Nashville, TN 37235

Pyrite samples synthesized with As, Co, or Ni impurities and without added impurities were oxidized in batch and mixed flow-through reactors in the presence of 1 mM ferric iron, at pH 2. Six samples from each dopant population were used to provide a statistically robust comparison; two natural samples from Leadville, CO (major impurities Pb, As, Bi, Ag, Zn) and Elba, Italy (Co, As) were also included. In each experiment, three reaction progress variables were monitored: ferric iron, ferrous iron, and sulfate. The pyrite samples with impurities have average oxidation rates that are faster than the undoped samples, with As- and Co-doped pyrite having the highest rates. As, Co and Ni were released to solution in accordance with their concentrations in the solid samples. As concentrations in the batch reactor experiments tended to remain constant, in contrast to Co and Ni, which increased over time. Initial rates, calculated from the batch reactor experiments, were faster than the steady-state rates calculated from the mixed flow-through reactor experiments. Apparent rates calculated using sulfate were faster than apparent rates calculated using ferric and ferrous iron, reflecting oxidation of ferrous iron in solution by dissolved oxygen. The results imply that impurities in pyrite do contribute to its reactivity, in agreement with studies using electrochemical methods. Oxidation rate differences among pyrite samples with different impurities are probably too small to warrant explicit consideration in environmental modeling applications, but are important to understanding pyrite oxidation mechanisms and semiconducting properties.

2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 36
The Environmental Geology and Geochemistry of Mineral Deposits: Best Practices for Effective Prediction, Mitigation, Closure, and Remediation II
Colorado Convention Center: 505
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 28 October 2007

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 102

© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.