| 2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007) | |
| Paper No. 167-7 | |
| Presentation Time: 3:20 PM-3:35 PM | ||
DIKE BRECCIAS IN THE DEEP BASEMENT-DERIVED SECTION OF THE EYREVILLE B CORE, CHESAPEAKE BAY IMPACT STRUCTURE | ||
|
REIMOLD, Wolf Uwe1, KENKMANN, Thomas2, GIBSON, Roger L.3, BARTOSOVA, Katerina4, SCHMITT, Ralf-Thomas2, HECHT, Lutz2, KOEBERL, Christian5, and HORTON, J. Wright Jr6, (1) Museum for Natural History, Humboldt University, Invalidenstrass 43, Berlin, 10115, Germany, uwe.reimold@museum.hu-berlin.de, (2) Museum for Natural History, Humboldt University, Invalidenstrasse 43, Berlin, 10115, Germany, (3) School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa, (4) Center for Earth Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, Vienna, A-1090, Austria, (5) Center for Earth Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria, (6) U.S. Geological Survey, 926A National Center, Reston, VA 20192 Dike breccias, including monomict and polymict lithic breccia, suevite, impact melt, and locally produced pseudotachylite (= friction melt), are known from many impact structures. Their origin is strongly debated. The Eyreville B core intersected a number of dike and fault breccia occurrences in the deep, basement-derived section (unshocked mica schists and granite/granite pegmatite) below 1551m depth. Mylonites occur in this section as well but are thought to predate the impact event like some of the brittle fault zones. Twenty samples from 15 dike breccia occurrences (< 1 cm - > 1 m in thickness) are available for petrographic and chemical analysis. Polymict lithic breccia (without melt particles) and suevite (with impact melt clasts), both with ample shocked clastic material, monomict lithic breccia (after quartz-rich muscovite schist, with shocked clasts), melt-bearing suevitic breccia (melt particles but without shocked clasts), and cataclasite (generally mica schist-granite mixtures, unshocked clasts) could be distinguished. In addition, one sample from 1554 m depth requires confirmation as polymict lithic breccia or suevite, and a sample from 1691.85 m depth could represent a pseudotachylite. Micropetrographic analysis is in progress. Only polymict lithic breccia and suevite dikes from the uppermost part of the section contain significant amounts of sedimentary target material. A large proportion of locally derived clastic material is everywhere observed. Seven suevitic dike breccias analysed so far have similar mica schist-like major element compositions, even if the immediate host rock is granitic. The dike materials have lower SiO2 and MgO contents and higher Al2O3, Fe2O3, Na2O and K2O contents than the main suevite package (67 samples analysed). It seems likely that the less competent schists facilitated stoping by impact breccias in comparison with granitic rocks. | ||
|
2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 167 The Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure: Results from the 2005–2006 ICDP-USGS Deep Drilling Project I Colorado Convention Center: 405 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 451 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||