| 2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007) | |
| Paper No. 128-13 | |
| Presentation Time: 11:40 AM-11:55 AM | ||
INFLUENCE OF MULTICOMPONENT NAPL DISSOLUTION ON CONTAMINANT-PLUME DYNAMICS | ||
|
MCCRAY, John E., Hydrologic Science and Engineering Program, Environmental Science and Engineering Division, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, jmccray@mines.edu Multicomponent NAPL dissolution is typically not considered when assessing contaminant plume movement from NAPL source zones. However, considering mixture dissolution is critically important for proper assessment of contaminant-plume dynamics. Typically, the source is considered to not be a NAPL source when the plume's center of mass is not stationary, which assumes that the plume's center of mass will always be co-located at the NAPL source. However, depending on the composition of the mixture and the magnitude of the ground-water velocity, a NAPL source can produce a plume with a moving centroid as the NAPL mixture dissolves. To demonstrate this phenomenon, a model is used that combines a numerical solution for NAPL- mixture source zone dissolution with an analytical solution of a 3-dimensional advection- dispersion equation. The model is used to simulate plume movement from a NAPL-mixture source at the Hanford Site in Washington state, USA. The purpose of this work is to show the potential importance of considering NAPL-mixture dissolution when assessing plume movement using realistic Hanford site data (groundwater velocities and NAPL-composition) for model input to ensure a realistic scenario. The NAPL source zone at the site is a complex mixture comprised of chlorinated solvents, lard oil, and butyl-phosphate compounds. At this site, a moving plume centroid has been used as evidence that no NAPL source exists even though other evidence suggests NAPL is present. The uncalibrated model demonstrates that the centroid of a carbon tetrachloride plume would be expected to move approximately 200 m under the higher flow rates associated with pump and treat, although insignificant movement of the centroid occurred during natural ground-water flow velocities prior to pump and treat. The model result is consistent with plume observations at the site. | ||
|
2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 128 Solute Plume Conceptual Models: Processes, Predictions, and Paradigms Colorado Convention Center: 705/707 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 352 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||