| 2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007) | |
| Paper No. 51-12 | |
| Presentation Time: 4:50 PM-5:05 PM | ||
WHERE IS THE DEEP GROUNDWATER DIVIDE IN SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN? | ||
|
BRADBURY, Kenneth R., Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Rd, Madison, WI 53705, krbradbu@facstaff.wisc.edu, HART, David J., Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI 53715, and FEINSTEIN, Daniel, USGS-WRD, 8505 Research Way, Middleton, WI 53562 Applying science to problems of public interest often requires translation of complex scientific findings into simple concepts that legislators, regulators, and the public can understand. There is currently significant societal interest in the historic and current positions of a deep groundwater divide in southeastern Wisconsin. The potentiometric divide in the deep Cambrian sandstone aquifer represents a hydrogeologic boundary between groundwater flowing east toward Lake Michigan and west toward the Mississippi River drainage basin. The groundwater divide does not coincide with regional surface-water or topographic divides. Our current understanding of the groundwater divide is based on estimates of historic groundwater use and regional groundwater flow models. Prior to development, in the region west of Milwaukee, the divide was probably located in western Waukesha County. Today, pumping from the deep aquifer in southeast Wisconsin has caused the divide to migrate westward several miles into Jefferson County, and the pumping centers, rather than Lake Michigan, have become the main discharge points for the regional flow system. Modeling shows that the divide is actually a complex three-dimensional surface that varies in position in relation to depth and time. Although current models give a reasonable estimate of the positions of the divide through time, regulators need to understand that the divide is not fixed in space and that different models and different analyses using the same model might yield multiple scientifically defensible estimates of the divide location. During recent legislative deliberations over the international Great Lakes Compact, the divide has gained legal and political significance as a potential regional groundwater boundary because the Compact bans future withdrawals of water from the Great Lakes Basin. On the basis of some legal interpretations still under debate, groundwater east of the divide might be considered waters of the Great Lakes, giving local communities rights to Lake Michigan water even though they lie outside the Great Lakes surface-water basin. Accordingly, establishing the position of the divide could be important for regional water management. | ||
|
2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 51 The Science of Groundwater Recharge, Coal Mine Hydrology/Geochemistry, Stream Restoration and its Application to the Public Good: In Honor of Mary W. Stoertz Colorado Convention Center: 702 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 28 October 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 134 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||