Northeastern Section - 42nd Annual Meeting (12–14 March 2007)
Paper No. 38-10
Presentation Time: 4:20 PM-4:40 PM

SHADOW ZONE CAPTURE DURING PURGING AND ITS IMPACT ON CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATION AVERAGING IN MONITORING WELLS

METCALF, Meredith1, ROBBINS, Gary1, HAREL, Ofer2, LI, Pengfei2, and MARTIN-HAYDEN, James3, (1) Department of Natural Resources Management and Engineering, Univ of Connecticut, 1376 Storrs Road, Storrs, CT 06269-4087, meredithmetcalf@yahoo.com, (2) Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, 215 Glenbrook Road, Unit 4120, Storrs, CT 06269-4120, (3) Dept. of Environmental Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 W. Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606

Although it is general practice to purge monitoring wells prior to sampling, the need for purging has been under debate for several years. The debate has been fueled by empirical studies that show the concentrations of volatiles collected prior to purging are about equal to those obtained following purging. These results are contrary to that of other field and modeling studies that show concentration averaging during purging and sampling could result in orders of magnitude differences between samples collected before and after purging. This study was performed to further investigate whether purging is necessary to sample a typical monitoring well. Unlike previous studies, here purging and sampling tests were conducted in one well over a period of 14 months to eliminate variance associated with different hydrogeologic conditions. It also involved examining a non-volatile, conservative constituent (chloride) in addition to a VOC (MTBE) to help eliminate constituent bias. Furthermore, a cluster of multilevel samplers upgradient allowed for an assessment of sampling results in consideration of flow to the well under ambient and pumping conditions, vertical concentration gradients, and concentration averaging in the well bore. The results of sampling without purging and with purging by a bailer and by low flow pumping were compared. No statistical differences were found. Also, the concentrations observed were close to calculated concentration averages. The lack of differences is likely due to drawing back down gradient water during purging that had passed through and had been averaged within the well bore between sampling rounds ("shadow zone"). Based on modeling, drawing the shadow zone back into the well during purging and sampling can dramatically moderate concentration averaging biases that result from vertical variations in concentration and hydraulic conductivity in the formation outside the well, water levels achieved in the well during purging and, perhaps, vertical borehole flow.

Northeastern Section - 42nd Annual Meeting (12–14 March 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 38
Contaminants in Groundwater-Surface Water Systems: Sources, Pathways, and Toxicities II
University of New Hampshire: Memorial Union Building, Theater II
1:00 PM-4:45 PM, Tuesday, 13 March 2007

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 1, p. 85

© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.