Joint South-Central and North-Central Sections, both conducting their 41st Annual Meeting (11–13 April 2007)
Paper No. 27-4
Presentation Time: 2:30 PM-2:50 PM

SCORPIONS AS EURYPTERID ANALOGS

BRANDT, Danita S. and MCCOY, Victoria E., Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, 206 Natural Science Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, brandt@msu.edu

Eurypterids are extinct, chelicerate arthropods that have been allied with the xiphosurans (particularly Limulus) and with arachnids (scorpions). The choice of which of these two modern groups to use as an eurypterid analog for paleobiological interpretations depends on the question being addressed. For studying eurypterid molting, scorpions are the logical choice as analog. Eurypterids and scorpions share striking morphologic and structural similarities despite their different habitats (aquatic vs. terrestrial): both the eurypterid opisthosoma and scorpion abdomen are differentiated into two portions, a broad, 7-segmented anterior portion, and a narrower 5-segment posterior portion that terminates in a telson (in eurypterids) or sting (in scorpions). Major differences between eurypterids and scorpions include the position of the mouth, and adaptations of scorpions to a terrestrial habitat (e.g., a lighter exoskeleton and spiracles in place of book gills). Despite these physiological differences, the similarities in basic body plan suggest that both groups faced similar functional challenges during ecdysis. Our study of comparative scorpion and eurypterid taphonomy reveals similar patterns of disarticulation between the two groups in support of this view. We conclude that body plan is the critical factor to consider in arthropod molting and that scorpions are the best extant group to use for insight to this aspect of eurypterid paleobiology.

Joint South-Central and North-Central Sections, both conducting their 41st Annual Meeting (11–13 April 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 27
Fossils and Modern Analogs: Using Modern Organisms to Improve Paleontological Interpretations
Kansas Union, University of Kansas: Big 12
1:20 PM-5:00 PM, Thursday, 12 April 2007

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 3, p. 54

© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.