| Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007) | |
| Paper No. 22-12 | |
| Presentation Time: 12:00 PM-12:20 PM | ||
BIOGENIC EXPLANATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECONDARY POROSITY IN LIMESTONES | ||
|
SCHWABE, Stephanie1, HERBERT, Rodney2, and CAREW, James1, (1) Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424, schwabes@cofc.edu, (2) Division of Environmental and Applied Biological Sciences Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, United Kingdom Today, the explanation for secondary porosity development, including caves, in carbonate islands and in carbonate coastal areas relies primarily on physico-chemical mixing-zone corrosion. We argue that this explanation does not correctly address the dissolutional potential of meteoric water, water passing through the vadose zone, and the groundwater. Analyses of rainwater indicate that it is buffered to pH values of 8.5 immediately after it contacts the ground in the Bahamas, and thus is not likely to accomplish much dissolution. Study of possible mixing corrosion (Moore and Martin, 2006) via mixing of waters occurring in the Bahamas indicates that it is incapable of explaining significant porosity development. Our studies document abundant microbially-generated CO2 (410-770 ppm above the current atmospheric concentration of 380 ppm) in the pores of cave wall rock; and that primarily heterotrophic bacteria are abundant in rainwater (~103 cells/ml), in water collected from dripstones (>104-105 cells/ml), and in groundwater (>106 cells/ml). These data indicate that bacterial generation of CO2 within the vadose and phreatic zones is the probable driving force in classical carbonic acid limestone dissolution. Our observations also indicate that porosity and permeability may be enhanced even during periods when the rock is not saturated with water. Bacteria living in rock pores within the vadose zone create conditions that lead to secondary porosity from the microscopic scale to moderate macroscopic voids depending on availability of water and organics. Bacteria in rock pores in the phreatic zone create conditions that enlarge pores within the rock and dissolve it from the inside out; and bacteria living in the water in flooded voids create conditions that lead to enlargement of the void by dissolving inward from the void walls. | ||
|
Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 22 Paleontological Potpourri Hyatt Regency Savannah on the Historic Riverfront: Ballroom D 8:00 AM-12:20 PM, Friday, 30 March 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 69 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||