| Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007) | |
| Paper No. 32-3 | |
| Presentation Time: 2:40 PM-3:00 PM | ||
AQUIFER AS THE FUNDAMENTAL UNIT IN HYDROSTRATIGRAPHY AND ITS IMPACT ON FLORIDA NOMENCLATURE | ||
|
MALLAMS, Jerry L. and DEWITT, David J., Brooksville, FL 34604, jerry.mallams@swfwmd.state.fl.us In hydrostratigraphy, the aquifer is not always recognized as the fundamental unit used to characterize the water-bearing units. An aquifer can be defined as the basic hydrostratigraphic unit used in describing and interpreting the hydrogeology of a region. This statement is supported by the methods in the North American Stratigraphic Code and also the definitions of a zone and aquifer system. A zone is a subdivision of an aquifer and an aquifer system is two or more aquifers that serve as a water-bearing hydrostratigraphic unit. These definitions indicate that an aquifer or group of aquifers must be present for a zone or aquifer system to exist. Therefore, the aquifer should be considered the fundamental unit in defining and describing hydrostratigraphic units. The three main hydrostratigraphic units in Florida are the surficial aquifer system, the intermediate aquifer system/intermediate confining unit, and the Floridan aquifer system. Inconsistencies related to ranking and application of the aquifer as the fundamental hydrostratigraphic unit results in the present classification of hydrostratigraphic units in Florida. Throughout large parts of Florida, the surficial aquifer system does not contain multiple aquifers and, therefore, does not rank as an aquifer system. The aquifer system rank can be applied if multiple aquifers are present in the hydrostratigraphic unit recognized as the surficial unit. The intermediate aquifer system, in southwest Florida, contains up to three water-bearing units. The prevalent way of ranking these water-bearing units has been as zones. Aquifer systems require two or more aquifers to be present separated at least locally by a confining unit. No aquifers are identified in the intermediate aquifer system. The hydrostratigraphic units ranked as zones should be ranked as aquifers. In regions where two or more aquifers are present and function as a water-bearing unit, the aquifers may be grouped and ranked as an aquifer system. The ranking inconsistencies result from the oversight of the aquifer as the fundamental unit of hydrostratigraphic classification. The changes to the ranking of hydrostratigraphic units underlying Florida described here should be considered as part of the current practices in ranking of these units in the United States. | ||
|
Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 32 Hydrostratigraphy and Hydrostratigraphic Nomenclatural Problems in the Southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain Hyatt Regency Savannah on the Historic Riverfront: Scarborough 2 2:00 PM-4:20 PM, Friday, 30 March 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 88 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||