| Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007) | |
| Paper No. 28-2 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:20 AM-9:40 AM | ||
TRANSPORT AND DEPOSITION OF COAL TAR CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS IN AN URBAN FRESHWATER STREAM | ||
|
VULAVA, Vijay M., Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424, vulavav@cofc.edu, MCKAY, Larry D., Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, 306 Earth and Planetary Sciences Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996-1410, DICKERSON, Syreeta, BWXT Y-12, Bear Creek Rd, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, COOPER, Lee, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, and MENN, Fu-Min, Center for Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 The goal of this research is to determine whether coal tar deposited in urban streams can be mobilized by flood events and be re-deposited in adjacent floodplain where human contact with contaminated sediment deposits is likely. The study was conducted at Chattanooga Creek, an urban freshwater stream located in Chattanooga, TN. For several decades, coal tar wastes were directly dumped or channeled into a 4 km reach of the Creek by a nearby coke plant. Streambed sediment characterization determined that large quantities of coal tar-rich sediments were present and that they were distributed according to the stream channel morphology. Analysis of soil and sediment cores in adjacent floodplain did not indicate black staining typically indicative of coal tar. However, all 16 EPA priority PAHs were detected in floodplain sediments up to a depth of 1.2 m b.g.s. and at distances of over 3 km downstream of the coke plant. These PAHs were rich in 4-6 benzene ring compounds compared with 2-3 ring PAHs signifying increased weathering and biodegradation of the 2-3 ring PAHs. Preliminary age dating of floodplain sediments using 137Cs and 210Pb suggested that sediment deposition is on the order of approximately 1 cm/yr and that peak PAH concentrations coincided with coking operations at the coke plant. These lines of evidence suggest that there is little or any direct contamination of the floodplain soils by the coal tar per se. Instead, the source of contamination of floodplain sediments is most likely by deposition of suspended stream sediments containing sorbed PAHs. It is hypothesized that coal tar acts as 1) a binding agent to sediments making them resistant to entrainment and transport in the stream during normal flow conditions and 2) a persistent source for PAH contamination of lower reaches of the stream and the floodplain during flood events. | ||
|
Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 28 Coal Geology and Related Issues: 2007 and Beyond Hyatt Regency Savannah on the Historic Riverfront: Scarborough 2 8:40 AM-11:20 AM, Friday, 30 March 2007 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 80 | ||
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||