| 2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM | |
| Paper No. 147-45 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-4:45 PM | ||
Environmental Significance of the Supercontinent Columbia | ||
|
ROGERS, John J.W., Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3315, jrogers@email.unc.edu and SANTOSH, M., Department of Natural Environmental Science, Kochi University, Akebono-cho 2-5-1, Kochi, 780-8520, Japan The supercontinent Columbia reached maximum packing at about 1.9 Ga. Prior to that time, the dominant magmatism produced highly deformed TTG (tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite) suites. Although some GG (granite-granodiorite; calcalkaline) batholiths formed in old cratons before 1.9 Ga, these suites became common after 1.9 Ga and are now typical of modern subduction zones. Two different configurations of Columbia have been proposed, based largely on the position of the North China (Sino-Korean) craton. One model places the southern margin (present orientation) of North China against the eastern margin of North America, particularly the Penokean belt. A second model places the North Hebei belt along the northern margin of North China against the western margin of India and correlates the Central Indian Tectonic Zone with the trans-North China orogen. Three changes in the surface environment occurred at the same time as the maximum packing of Columbia at 1.9 Ga: 1) atmospheric oxygen concentrations had increased sufficiently to cause a switch from the deposition of reduced iron formations to oxidized red beds; 2) the composition of ocean water changed from carbonate rich to sulfate rich; and 3) the oldest eukaryote biomarkers (steranes) occur in sediments. Development of oxygen- and sulfate-rich seawater could only have occurred in shallow water. The area of Columbia that was below sealevel is unknown, but presumably much of it was covered by shallow water. This shallow ocean would have been an ideal place for the evolution of eukaryotes. | ||
|
2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 147--Booth# 173 Structural Geology / Tectonics / Neotectonics/Paleoseismology (Posters) George R. Brown Convention Center: Exhibit Hall E 8:00 AM-4:45 PM, Sunday, 5 October 2008 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 40, No. 6, p. 157 | ||
© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||