| 2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM | |
| Paper No. 275-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 2:30 PM-2:45 PM | ||
Implementing a Research Project Employing Remotely Operable Microbeam Instrumentation in Introductory and Junior-Level Geoscience Courses: Formative Results | ||
|
RYAN, Jeffrey, Department of Geology, SCA-528, Univ of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, SCA 528, Tampa, FL 33620, ryan@shell.cas.usf.edu "Project-based" learning approaches, employing research instrumentation in the conduct of laboratory and/or structured research activities in science courses, are widely utilized, in part because such evidence as has been collected indicates strongly positive student and faculty impressions of these activities. Interestingly, little information related to the specific student learning benefits of classroom research instrumentation has thus far been reported, aside from reports of the logistical difficulties these approaches can introduce into courses. In this NSF-CCLI funded project, we remove a key logistical obstacle - ready access to instruments during class times - through the use of a remotely operable electron microprobe and scanning electron microscope, at the Florida Center for Analytical Electron Microscopy-FIU that we use routinely via an Internet2-supported Web connection. These instruments are employed to support student term projects in a Junior-level mineralogy/petrology course, and an introductory geoscience/planetary science course. Instrument usage is integrated into instruction through brief introductory lectures, and whole-class laboratory exercises during which the instruments are used to image and analyze selected class samples, as per student direction. Students work in teams on SEM/microprobe data collection, choosing the samples to study, preparing/polishing them as a class activity, and analyzing them during lab periods and/or scheduled times outside of class. Student impression surveys indicate (as expected) strongly positive student response to both learning instrument use and to the research activities this supports. Logistical issues associated with sample selection and preparation led to modifying schedules in both classes to spread this work out over longer time periods. Student learning and educational impact is assessed via embedded questions in pre-tests and post-tests administered in each course, and through participation of students in post-course research offerings - four students enrolled for research credit in this past academic year. Embadded test questions are currently being reviewed by mineralogy/petrology educators. | ||
|
2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 275 Teaching Petrology and Structural Geology in the 21st Century George R. Brown Convention Center: 332BE 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 40, No. 6, p. 420 | ||
© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||