2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM
Paper No. 330-1
Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-8:15 AM

In-Situ Leach Uranium Mining In the United States- Overview of Production and Remediation Issues

OTTON, James K . and HALL, Susan M., Energy Program, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 939 Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, Lakewood, CO 80225, jkotton@usgs.gov

In 2007, 4.53 million pounds of U3O8 were produced in the U.S., virtually all of it from in- situ leach (ISL) deposits in Wyoming, Nebraska, and Texas. Uranium production in the U.S. will likely be dominated by such mining during the next 5-7 yr, until existing conventional mills come into full production and new conventional mills are built. From its beginning in the 1960s, ISL mining has been considered as a lower-cost, more environmentally friendly alternative to conventional underground or open-pit mining and surface milling. The character of the leach solution has changed since the early use of sulfuric acid, which was abandoned early on in the U.S. because of plugging problems and the difficulty in restoring acid-treated aquifers. Subsequent leachates have included sodium, calcium, and ammonium bicarbonate, hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. In each case, an oxidant and a complexing agent are needed to solubilize the uranium and form complexes to keep it in solution.

Leaching solutions not only dissolve uranium but many other unwanted components from minerals in the host formation, many of which typically remain dissolved in the aquifer being mined at levels above baseline after the leachate no longer carries enough uranium to be economically recovered. Moreover, many of the dissolved major elements are at concentrations sufficiently high to exceed the solubilities of various minerals which then precipitate, plugging the formation and operational plumbing, and reducing the effectiveness of extraction and subsequent remediation. Remediation techniques include flushing, reverse osmosis to clean waters used for flushing, introduction of reductants, and introduction of agents to reduce undesirable solute species or to control plugging. Bioremediation has been studied experimentally.

2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 330
Hydrogeology III - Uranium, Metals, and Other Contaminants in Groundwater
George R. Brown Convention Center: 342BE
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Thursday, 9 October 2008

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 40, No. 6, p. 527

© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.