| 2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM | |
| Paper No. 310-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 2:15 PM-2:30 PM | ||
Interpreting Specific Types of Paleowetlands; Examples from the Pennsylvanian of the Central Appalachian Basin | ||
|
GREB, Stephen F., Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, 228 Mining and Mineral Resources Building, Lexington, KY 40506-0107, greb@uky.edu and EBLE, Cortland F., Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, 228 Mining and Mineral Resources Bldg, Lexington, KY 40506-0107 Coal beds are the deposits of peats, which are a type of wetland soil formed in mires. There are many types of mires. Increment sampling of coals allows for identification of vertical and lateral changes in palynomorphs, macerals, and geochemistry that can be attributed to changes in the specific types of mires that formed the coal bed. In the middle Pennsylvanian of the central Appalachian basin, compositional groups based on palynomorphs, petrography, ash yield, and sulfur content can be attributed to a range of modern peat-forming wetland types. In some cases, vertical successions of compositional groups exhibit a temporal decrease in ash yield, sulfur content, and petrography associated with a change in palynoflora from water-loving arborescent lycopsids to ferns and shrubbier lycopsids, analogous to topogenous to ombrogenous mire successions exhibited in modern tropical raised mires. By compensating for palynoflora changes through time, compositional group analyses can be useful for interpreting specific types of paleomires, and potential hydroseres. Aside from coals, many non-peat-forming wetlands are also preserved. Rooting horizons below dark, carbonaceous shales, in situ Stigmaria, lycopod trunks or miner's “kettlebottoms,” and shales and siltstones containing compression floras often represent paleowetlands. The components of these non-peat-forming forest and shrub wetlands are often used as part of the criteria for identifying larger sedimentary facies. For example, rooting in interbedded sands and shales near a paleochannel may be part of the evidence for interpreting the larger sedimentary unit as a levee or proximal splay. But what is sometimes overlooked, is that the rooting horizon or buried stump horizon represents an individual paleowetland. If the extent and distribution of lateral and vertical sedimentary facies can be determined, then both peat- and non-peat-forming wetlands can be classified as estuarine, riparian, lacustrine, or paludal wetlands. | ||
|
2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 310 Coal Geology George R. Brown Convention Center: 320ABC 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, 8 October 2008 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 40, No. 6, p. 492 | ||
© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||