Cordilleran Section (104th Annual) and Rocky Mountain Section (60th Annual) Joint Meeting (19–21 March 2008)
Paper No. 14-4
Presentation Time: 9:05 AM-9:25 AM

THE PHYSICAL IMPACT OF MAFIC REPLENISHMENTS ON SILICIC MAGMA CHAMBERS IN THE VINALHAVEN INTRUSIVE COMPLEX, MAINE, USA

WIEBE, Robert A., Earth and Environment, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 176043003, bwiebe@fandm.edu, HAWKINS, David P., Department of Geosciences, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023, SNYDER, Don, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, and WARK, David A., GE Global Research, One Research Circle, Niskayuna, NY 12309

The Vinalhaven Intrusive Complex is a bimodal, shallow level pluton dominated by granite (72-74% SiO2). Within it, basaltic injections produced a gabbro-diorite unit more than 2 km thick with gabbroic layers between 10 and 100 meters thick. The bases of these layers are chilled against more felsic rocks and commonly grade upward through hybrid rocks to granite. After basaltic magma is injected, one would expect convective velocities on the order of 0.5 to 2 meters/day in overlying crystal-poor silicic magma (Snyder, 2000). Granite 10s of meters above mafic sheets contains mafic enclaves up to 20 cm in diameter; their settling velocity approximates the expected maximum due to mafic input. Their occurrence appears to indicate that 10s of meters of granitic crystal mush accumulated as convective velocity decayed and larger mafic enclaves settled out.

Heat from the basaltic injections went dominantly upward, via convection into an overlying silicic magma. The nature of preservation does not reveal the thickness of crystal-poor silicic magma at the time of mafic injection, but a rough, order-of-magnitude estimate can be made via thermal arguments. Application of the Ti in quartz thermometer (Wark and Watson, 2006) to Ti zoning in quartz crystals in the overlying granite indicates temperature increases of 20° to 120°C. These temperatures place an approximate upper bound on the temperature increase in the silicic magma and a lower bound on the thickness of silicic magma (melt and crystals) needed to absorb the heat provided by the mafic injections. Given the thickness of the mafic magma and the thermodynamic properties of the two magmas, the lower bound on the thickness of silicic magma was at least 100s of meters, and perhaps as much as a kilometer. If it were thinner, it would have responded by a greater temperature increase.

Cordilleran Section (104th Annual) and Rocky Mountain Section (60th Annual) Joint Meeting (19–21 March 2008)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 14
Mafic-Silicic Magmatism: Crystallization Histories, Magma Interactions, and Eruption Mechanisms I
University of Nevada-Las Vegas: Student Union 208C
8:00 AM-11:30 AM, Thursday, 20 March 2008

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 40, No. 1, p. 62

© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.