| Northeastern Section - 43rd Annual Meeting (27-29 March 2008) | |
| Paper No. 17-2 | |
| Presentation Time: 1:00 PM-5:00 PM | ||
EMPLACEMENT OF THE MAIDSTONE AND BLACK HILLS PLUTONS, COMPOSITE INTRUSIONS ON THE MARGINS OF THE NORTHEAST KINGDOM BATHOLITH, VERMONT | ||
|
FILIP, Clark J.1, MILLER, Johnathon2, and WESTERMAN, David S.2, (1) Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, James Hall 56 College Rd, Durham, NH 03824, cjd47@unh.edu, (2) Department of Geology and Environmental Science, Norwich University, 158 Harmon Drive, Northfield, VT 05663 The Maidstone and Black Hills plutons are located respectively on the eastern and western margins of the Northeast Kingdom batholith, a Devonian-aged complex in northeastern Vermont that intruded the regionally metamorphosed and deformed rocks of the Connecticut Valley – Gaspé Trough. Recent geologic, petrologic, and geochemical analyses of these two plutons show that they have overall similarities with respect to their geochemical variability and emplacement histories. Diorite, tonalitic granodiorite, monzogranite, and leucocratic low-Ti monzogranite occur as discrete zones within the Maidstone pluton; similarly, discrete zones of quartz diorite, low-Ti quartz monzodiorite, and quartz monzogranite to granodiorite make up the Black Hills pluton. In each case, the pluton is composite, with contrasting mineralogy and geochemistry between individual intrusions that were produced by discrete magma pulses. Additionally, the region surrounding the Black Hills body includes discrete intrusions of the same lithologies, along with granodioritic dikes, that make up the main pluton. The composite character of each pluton is particularly well supported by overlapping ranges of silica content accompanied by distinctive abundances of other elements, producing sharp graphical separation on discrimination diagrams. These relationships suggest development of composite plutons in the Northeast Kingdom batholith by sequential emplacement of evolving magma sources, and raise the question as to whether or not this process may be the rule rather than the exception. | ||
|
Northeastern Section - 43rd Annual Meeting (27-29 March 2008)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 17--Booth# 41 Granites and Migmatites—Relations in the Northeastern Appalachians (Posters) Hyatt Regency Buffalo: Grand Ballroom C 1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Thursday, 27 March 2008 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 40, No. 2, p. 25 | ||
© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||