| Southeastern Section - 57th Annual Meeting (10–11 April 2008) | |
| Paper No. 27-11 | |
| Presentation Time: 4:50 PM-5:10 PM | ||
CONSTRAINTS ON THE EVOLUTION AND EMPLACEMENT OF THE BUCK CREEK COMPLEX AND OTHER BLUE RIDGE ULTRAMAFIC ROCKS, WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR OPHIOLITE EMPLACEMENT IN COLLISIONAL OROGENS | ||
|
PETERSON, Virginia, Geology Department, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, petersvi@gvsu.edu and RYAN, Jeffrey, Department of Geology, SCA-528, Univ of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620 The Buck Creek mafic-ultramafic complex, among the largest alpine ultramafic bodies in the southern Blue Ridge, originated as a mid-ocean ridge cumulate massif, with subsequent deep emplacement in a subduction zone setting. Within the ultramafic body, dunite, troctolite, anorthosite, and spinel display centimeter- to meter-scale interlayering. Troctolitic rocks locally grade into the amphibolites that enclose the body. Meta-troctolite and metadunite compositions define almost continuous mixing between olivine and plagioclase end-members on an MgO vs. Al2O3 diagram, with some troctolites and amphibolites extending toward augitic clinopyroxene to define a “cumulate triangle” of cumulate compositions. Low-Ti amphibolites fall within the triangle, while high-Ti amphibolites are geochemically consistent with gabbroic protoliths. Relatively abundant troctolite cumulates, scarce pyroxene in the ultramafic rocks, and high Al2O3/TiO2 with low Cr-numbers in spinels best match LOT- or L-type ophiolites, consistent with crystallization in a slow-spreading mid-ocean ridge setting. Sapphirine-bearing, spinel symplectites in the meta-troctolites suggest that Buck Creek rocks were largely anhydrous to ~800°C and ~0.9-1.1 GPa, conditions atypical of ophiolite emplacement. Limited hydration, mostly along contacts, took place near peak pressure conditions, possibly facilitating ductile disaggregation and emplacement of the body. Comparisons to the Zermatt-Saas ophiolite suggest rapid subduction of Buck Creek rocks to depths of ~ 30 km, where partial hydration, facilitated by prograde dehydration of surrounding rocks, aided in its emplacement into the subduction zone hanging wall. Similar lithologies and prograde metamorphic assemblages in the nearby Lake Chatuge and Carroll Knob complexes point to comparable igneous origins and metamorphic histories, suggesting deep emplacement of oceanic rocks in a pre-Taconic subduction setting. By contrast, ultramafic and amphibolite bodies to the northeast in the Central Blue Ridge Cartoogechaye and Mars Hill terranes, including the Webster-Addie complex, differ compositionally, and record different metamorphic histories. | ||
|
Southeastern Section - 57th Annual Meeting (10–11 April 2008)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 27 Tectonics of the Blue Ridge and Adjacent Areas II: A Session Honoring Professor Loren Raymond Hilton Charlotte University Place: Lakeshore Ballroom Salons III&IV 1:30 PM-5:40 PM, Friday, 11 April 2008 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 40, No. 4, p. 69 | ||
© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||