| 2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009) | |
| Paper No. 258-46 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-6:00 PM | ||
FINGERPRINTING CU-BEARING TOURMALINE USING TRACE ELEMENTS AND LI AND B STABLE ISOTOPES | ||
|
SHABAGA, Brandi, Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 240 Wallace Bldg, Winnipeg, MB R3T2N2, Canada, brandishabaga@gmail.com, FAYEK, Mostafa, Geological Sciences, Univ. Manitoba, 240 Wallace Bldg, Winnipeg, MB R3T2N2, Canada, and HAWTHORNE, Frank, Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 240 Wallace Bldg, 125 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada Cu-bearing (“Paraíba”) tourmalines are by far the most valuable and popular of the gem tourmalines, commanding up to $20,000/carat. Traditionally, the name “Paraíba” is reserved for Cu- and Mn-bearing tourmalines that are bright blue to green from the da Batalha Mine in Paraíba state, north-eastern Brazil. Saturated and less saturated blue and green tourmalines have been mined from other deposits near the da Batalha mine as well as in Morocco, Mozambique and Nigeria. The saturated variety of these gem-quality tourmalines cannot be distinguished from Paraíba tourmalines using standard gemological testing or semi-quantitative EDXRF analysis. Trace-element analysis by LA- ICP-MS has achieved some success at distinguishing tourmalines from Brazil, Mozambique and Nigeria. The ICP-MS study by Abduriyim et al. (2006) used Be, Pb, Mn and Cu to discriminate between Cu-bearing tourmalines; there is slight overlap in trace-element composition between tourmalines from Brazil and Nigeria and significant overlap between tourmalines from Nigeria and Mozambique. Here we use secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to measure the stable isotopes of Li and B and trace-element compositions of Cu-bearing tourmaline from Brazil, Morocco and Nigeria in order to differentiate between sources. Secondary ion mass spectrometry is an in situ micro-analytical technique that is relatively non-destructive and uses a primary focused ion beam to analyze elements and isotopes of interest. δ11B values of tourmalines from Brazil range from -1.1‰ to 1.7‰, whereas δ11B values of tourmaline from Nigeria and Morocco range from 0.1‰ to 3.8‰ and 10.4‰ to 14.6‰, respectively. Tourmalines from each country have relatively homogenous δ11B values. Although the δ11B values of tourmaline from Brazil and Nigeria overlap, tourmalines from Brazil, Morocco and Nigeria can be easily fingerprinted by coupling Pb and Be contents with δ11B values. δ7Li values of tourmaline have greater overlap between mines from the various countries. However, Li isotopes can be used to distinguish between tourmalines within a single country. Ref: Abduriyim, et al. (2006) Gems & Gemology, 42:4-21. | ||
|
2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 258--Booth# 352 Sigma Gamma Epsilon Undergraduate Research (Posters) Oregon Convention Center: Hall A 9:00 AM-6:00 PM, Wednesday, 21 October 2009 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 41, No. 7, p. 671 | ||
© Copyright 2009 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||