CALL FOR PROPOSALS:

ORGANIZERS

  • Harvey Thorleifson, Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • Carrie Jennings, Vice Chair
    Minnesota Geological Survey
  • David Bush, Technical Program Chair
    University of West Georgia
  • Jim Miller, Field Trip Chair
    University of Minnesota Duluth
  • Curtis M. Hudak, Sponsorship Chair
    Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC

 

Paper No. 1
Presentation Time: 1:45 PM

REVISITING LONG-TERM DUSTFALL RATES AND CHEMISTRY, COLORADO FRONT RANGE


DETHIER, David P., Dept. Geosciences, Williams College, 947 Main Street, Williamstown, MA 01267, MCCARTHY, James A., Dept. Geosciences, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267 and OUIMET, William B., Geography, University of Connecticut, Beach Hall, Unit 2045, Storrs, CT 06269-4148, David.P.Dethier@williams.edu

For many decades, geomorphologists and soil scientists have noted the influence of dustfall (clay + silt) on the morphology, texture and chemistry of late Pleistocene and Holocene soils in the Front Range and other upland areas of the S. Rocky Mountains. Contemporary measurements demonstrate the influence of dustfall P and other elements on ecosystem function, but deposition rates over longer time periods are also significant. In addition, recent advances in applying meteoric 10Be to analyze soil age and evolution argue that dust may be an important component of 10Be delivery. Measurements from sites in the Boulder Creek catchment and published values from nearby areas suggest that the long-term, net clay accumulation rate is about 0.04 gm cm-2 kyr-1 in soils on stable, dated surfaces such as Neoglacial, Pinedale and Bull Lake moraines. Clay concentration in parent material is the principal source of measurement uncertainty. Clay+ silt accumulation rates are ~0.1 gm cm-2 kyr-1. Because measured accumulation rates integrate fines generated by weathering and dustfall, they provide an upper limit for dustfall rates. If our values are correct, dustfall should not significantly influence the total amount of met10Be delivered to soil surfaces in the upland Front Range. The chemistry of soil fine fractions does not permit clear separation of pedogenic vs. dustfall origin nor provide simple clues about dust provenance. Trace components such as Zr, Nb and P show strong size fractionation in crushed fresh-rock samples of Boulder Creek granodiorite and other local rock types, complicating elemental-ratio approaches for assessing the origin of fine material. Contemporary dustfall measurements in the upland Front Range suggest that modern rates are much greater than long-term values, perhaps reflecting changes in land use or climate.
Meeting Home page GSA Home Page