GSA Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, USA - 2017

Paper No. 140-10
Presentation Time: 4:20 PM

DO MID-CRUSTAL CORDILLERAN BATHOLITHS RECORD ARC FLARE-UP TRIGGERING PROCESSES?


SCHWARTZ, Joshua J., Department of Geological Sciences, California State University Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330, TULLOCH, Andrew J., Institute of Geol & Nuclear Sciences, 764 Cumberland St, Dunedin, New Zealand, ANDICO, S., Department of Geological Sciences, California State University Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, CA 91330, STOWELL, Harold H., Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, KLEPEIS, Keith A., Geology, University of Vermont, Trinity Campus, Burlington, VT 05405, KITAJIMA, Kouki, WiscSIMS, Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1215 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706 and VALLEY, John, Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, joshua.j.schwartz@gmail.com

Triggering mechanisms responsible for Cordilleran arc flare-ups are hotly debated and there is little consensus about whether magmatic surges are driven by upper-plate processes (e.g., underthrusting of fertile continental crust) or mantle processes (e.g., slab tears/break-off). Radiogenic and stable isotopes in shallow- to mid-crustal batholithic rocks are commonly employed to provide insights into flare-up processes; however, it is unclear whether these rocks accurately record triggering processes, versus intra-crustal processing during transport through the crust and/or deep-crustal remelting and mixing.

We compare and contrast isotopic signatures from both mid- and lower crustal batholithic rocks in the Early Cretaceous portion of the 260-105 Ma Median Batholith, Fiordland, New Zealand to provide insights into this debate. We find that zircons from mafic to intermediate rocks in the lower crustal Western Fiordland Orthogneiss record a narrow isotopic range, with pluton-average zircon δ18O values ranging from 5.3 to 6.1‰, and εHf values ranging from +2.9 to +5.0. These zircons show no evidence for interaction with crust, and we interpret them as having equilibrated with an enriched, sub-arc, lithospheric mantle melt. By contrast, mid-crustal rocks have more complex isotopic systematics that reflect variable interaction with a hydrothermally altered source. Eastern Separation Point Suite zircons from the Titiroa and Takahe plutons give δ18O zircon values ranging from 3.7 to 3.9‰, and εHf values ranging from +7.2 to +7.6. Western Separation Point Suite zircons from the Puteketeke, Refrigerator Orthogneiss and West Arm Leucogranite show a strong, E-W isotopic gradient with δ18O values ranging from 4.7 to 5.9‰, and εHf values ranging from +6.0 to +4.4. Isotopic modeling indicates that mid-crustal zircons are well described by 0-30% mixing of average Largs terrane (hydrothermally altered) crust with an enriched mantle melt. We conclude that lower crustal zircons record a mantle-driven flare-up involving an enriched, sub-arc lithospheric mantle source. In contrast, mid-crustal zircons display significant intra-crustal remelting and mixing. The absence of this signal in lower crustal plutons indicates that this crustal source was not a key factor in igniting the Cretaceous arc flare-up.