FLORAL TURNOVER AND CLIMATIC CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CRETACEOUS/PALEOGENE (K/T) BOUNDARY, NORTH DAKOTA, USA
Both ordination and stratigraphic range data show changing floral composition within the Cretaceous, with the highest significant turnover 15 m below the boundary. However, the loss of plant diversity and change in floral composition associated with the K/T boundary significantly exceeds earlier turnovers and is consistent with a single, major extinction event. There are 80 species with more than one stratigraphic occurrence in the section as a whole that either occur or range through the interval between the K/T boundary and 15 m below. Of these 80, 51 do not occur in the Paleocene, and 29 occur last at the highest well-sampled level in the Cretaceous, which is 3.6 m below the boundary, or even higher in the Cretaceous. Confidence intervals of 50% on the range tops of the 51 "victims" bracket the K/T boundary, highlighting the boundary as the most likely extinction horizon for these taxa and suggesting a Signor-Lipps smear on the range tops of the less well-sampled fraction that mostly have last appearances further below the K/T boundary. The 51 victims therefore are the most likely to have suffered a real extinction at the K/T boundary, yielding a conservative extinction estimate of 64% (51/80). Only 10 species with multiple stratigraphic occurrences have first appearances during the Paleocene.
Leaf-margin analyses based on range-through taxa estimate a cooling of 2-3 deg. C of mean annual temperature near the base of the section; warming of ~5 deg. C to ~15 deg. C into the upper 35 m of the Hell Creek; a peak of warmth near -15 m, within chron 29R, of ~18 deg. C; possible cooling in the uppermost 3 m; and a reversion to cool temperatures in the basal Paleocene of 9-12 deg. C. The temperature trends correspond well to foraminiferal data from several, latitudinally widely spaced cores, implying a linkage of terrestrial and marine climates. Paleocene plant diversity is significantly lower than Cretaceous samples from similar paleotemperatures, such that climate change is not a sufficient explanation for the plant extinctions, nor, by extension, dinosaur extinctions.