ENIGMATIC "TUBE-LIKE" STRUCTURES IN THE NOONDAY DOLOMITE: CONSTRAINTS ON POSSIBLE HYPOTHESES
The three most reasonable previously proposed hypotheses were tested using these constraints: fluid escape, karst, and interstromatolite fill.
The fluid escape structures hypothesis fails to meet all five constraints. In particular, known escape structures commonly show evidence for destruction of the host rock, in marked contrast to the diffuse tube margin noted here. In the special case of methane escape, one would expect botryoidal carbonate cements with d13C values of approximately -30 to -70 PDB to line the void spaces; this is not noted in the Noonday Dolomite.
The karstification structure hypothesis fails to meet the first and third constraint since the structures do not root down from a karst surface and dissolution would imply destruction of the host rock. Dissolution surfaces are often characterized by a buildup of insolubles and sharp interfaces (not noted here).
The final hypothesis would suggest that the tubes are interstromatolite spaces. This mechanism provides for the formation of the spaces between stromatolites not only within the dome, but also at the surface of the dome. Furthermore, this mechanism is constructional, not destructive in nature. Since stromatolites build upward towards sunlight, the growth of the spaces between them has an upward motivation as well. Lastly, this hypothesis allows for the host-rock and tube-fill to be precipitated at the same time and in the same seawater conditions, thus preserving isotopic homogeneity. Therefore, the interstromatolite spaces hypothesis is not falsified by the evidence found in this study.