PROBING THE MAXIMUM AGE LIMITS FOR ESR DATING: COMPARATIVE ANALYSES FOR MIOCENE FOSSILS FROM SHANXI CHINA AND THE SNAKE CREEK FAUNA, NEBRASKA
For all the teeth tested, the accumulated dose (AS) curves showed that the ESR signal was close to saturation. Consequently, the AS determinations required added doses up to 3-4 Mrad, and are associated with larger uncertainties than would normally occur for tooth enamel dating. Because the teeth contained large U concentrations in the dentine and enamel, the internal dose rates dominate over the external dose rates. The calculated ages depend strongly on the assumed U uptake model. Assuming early uptake, these teeth gave ages ranging from 200 to 550 ka, while a linear uptake assumption yielded ages from 0.4 to 1.1 Ma. Given the stratigraphy of these two sites, these ages are clearly too young. Assuming recent U uptake (RU) with an uptake parameter p=10 gave ages ranging from 1.6 to 4.5 Ma, but using p=20 resulted in ages from 2.8 to 7.0 Ma. Assuming p=200 yielded ages from 6.4 to 13.1 Ma. The isochrons do suggest secondary U uptake has occurred, which can be best modeled by an RU model.
Two scenarios may apply here: Either the traps which form the ESR signals have already reached saturation in these teeth, meaning that the teeth are beyond the maximum age limit for ESR dating, or they acquired 99% of their U within the last few thousand years, meaning that an ultra-RU model applies. Understanding U uptake in old teeth will be critical in deciding between these possibilities.