HOW RELIABLE ARE "HIGH-RESOLUTION" RADIO-ISOTOPIC AGES?
Due to their high analytical precision (< 0.2% of the age in many cases) U/Pb and 40Ar/39Ar dating methods are the most important techniques applied to Phanerozoic rocks. The potential accuracy of the U/Pb method is comparable to its achievable precision (though even this potential has been overstated), due to the feasibility of gravimetrically calibrated spikes and to the precisely determined uranium decay constants. However, recent studies have shown that the application of the U/Pb method to Phanerozoic zircons in volcanic layers is often (but not always) limited - even with state-of-the-art single-crystal or ion microprobe techniques - by the now-familiar problems of subtle Pb loss combined with varying amounts and sources of inheritance and/or pre-eruptive magma residence time, so that the resulting age-scatter prohibits extraction of a statistically robust age. In contrast, despite its excellent potential age resolution, the 40Ar/39Ar method is limited in absolute accuracy to no better than ±2% due mainly to uncertainties in the 40K decay constants and the true 40K-40Ar of standards.
Acknowledgment of the above-described limitations (well-understood by most geochronologists, but less so by the stratigraphic community) is particularly important for questions requiring time-scale accuracy, such as studying sequence boundaries. In particular it is critical not to confuse reliability with stated analytical precision, because the latter seldom include all sources of error and in any case are not generally comparable. We present recently acquired U/Pb data showing that inferences from U/Pb-zircon dating must be based on sufficiently large suites of single-crystal (or smaller), high-precision analyses which are subjected to a stringent and realistic interpretation. Also, we present results from ongoing studies designated to intercalibrate U/Pb and K/Ar isotopic systems.