BANDED IRON FORMATIONS AS GUIDES FOR THE HISTORY OF THE LITHOSPHERE, ATMOSPHERE, AND HYDROSPHERE
The tectonic settings and thermal structure of hydrothermal systems for Lake Superior-type BIFs were probably similar to those for sediment-hosted massive sulfide and Mississippi Valley-type deposits; they accrued in intra-continental basins and their heat sources were probably deep-seated mantle plumes. In contrast, Algoma-type BIFs and VMS mostly deposited in deep (>2 km) basins that developed in back-arc or intra-continental rift systems; their heat sources were probably shallow-seated magmas and intrusives. The higher abundance and general larger size of Archean BIFs to younger BIFs probably reflects higher heat flow in the Archean crust-mantle system rather than a difference in atmospheric chemistry.
Differences in the morphology (e.g., dimensions) and mineralogy (e.g., oxides, carbonates, sulfides) of BIFs and VMS were most likely generated by varying relative concentrations of: (a) Fe2+ and, (b) H2S in hydrothermal fluid, and (c) O2 (aq), (d) CO2 (+ HCO3-), and (e) H2S (+ HS-) in local seawater. While (a) and (b) were largely controlled by the thermal structure of a hydrothermal plumbing system, (c), (d), and (e) were greatly influenced by atmospheric pO2 and pCO2 values and by the hydrological regimes of depositional basins (e.g., restricted vs. open; stratified vs. non-stratified). For example, lower O2 levels in local seawater would tend to spread oxide BIFs thinly and widely. Siderite BIFs are favored in evaporitic basins under a high pCO2 atmosphere. The common occurrence of ferric (hydr)oxides as primary minerals in Algoma-type BIFs suggests the atmosphere-ocean system has been basically oxic since ~3.8 Ga ago.