ICP-MS/TIMS ANALYSES OF MONAZITES AND XENOTIME FROM MIGMATITES IN THE AAR MASSIF
U and Th were determined on a Nu Instruments multicollector ICP-MS. Sample runs were bracketed with a mixed U-Th standard to enable correction for fractionation and the ionisation efficiency difference between U and Th. Pb was run on a single collector Ion Instruments (AVCO) TIMS using an electron multiplier in analog mode.
The monazite grains gave similar U-Th-Pb sets of ages, concordant within analytical error. In the order 208Pb/232Th, 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ages, they are, grain 1: 329 ± 5 Ma, 327 ± 4 Ma, and 338 ± 17 Ma; grain 2: 314 ± 3 Ma, 313 ± 3 Ma and 324 ± 8 Ma. The results are interpreted as indicating the crystallisation ages of the monazites. The xenotime grain yielded discordant results: 222 ± 14 Ma, 341 ± 14 Ma and 2890 ± 90 Ma, probably indicating its Alpidic formation with radiogenic Pb inherited from Precambrian zircon, and incorporation of additional Th. Similarly, the previous zircon results on the same sample reveal a scatter typical of multiple discordance.
The monazite Pb runs showed a greatly suppressed Pb ionisation in TIMS, with signals between 40 and 100 x smaller than expected for the amount of Pb. As the xenotime analysis did not show this effect (and no-chemistry zircon single grain Pb analyses dont either) the effect may be due to abundant Ce on the filament: Ce could act as an electron donor preventing the formation of Pb+. For isotope dilution analyses this merely reduces the precision and indicates a necessity for miniaturised chemistry on monazites in future. However it may imply that, for ion microprobe dating, a strongly matrix-dependent ionisation of Pb could reduce the confidence in measured Pb concentrations, and therefore in U-Pb and Th-Pb ages, and may account for the discrepancy between TIMS and SIMS ages for our sample. The large deviation of EMP ages from those by other techniques remains unexplained.