Cordilleran Section - 98th Annual Meeting (May 13–15, 2002)

Paper No. 0
Presentation Time: 8:35 AM

CO2 AND H2S IN THE AIR OVER THE GROUND-SWELLING AREA WEST OF SOUTH SISTER VOLCANO, CENTRAL OREGON CASCADE RANGE


GERLACH, Terrence M., MCGEE, Kenneth A. and DOUKAS, Michael P., U.S. Geological Survey, Cascades Volcano Observatory, 1300 SE Cardinal Court #100, Vancouver, WA 98683-9589, tgerlach@usgs.gov

Intruding magma at ~6.5 km depth inferred to cause the InSAR-based inflation rate of 0.006 km3/y in the area of ground swelling west of South Sister volcano (C. Wicks, personal communication) would support only low levels of CO2 emission. This assessment holds even if the inflation is due to intrusion of mafic magma, which is among the most CO2-rich magmas and the most frequently erupted magma of the past 15,000 years in the Three Sisters region (Scott et al. 1999). Mafic magma with a liberal range of CO2 contents (0.25-1.25 wt%) and accumulating at the inflation rate 6.5 km beneath the surface would degas only 100-500 metric tons/day (t/d) of CO2. These degassing rates are on the low end of CO2 emission rates observed at passively degassing volcanoes but are potentially detectable by airborne techniques—examples being the 200- to 300-t/d emission rates measured at Mt. Baker volcano, WA (McGee et al. 2001) and Mammoth Mountain, CA (Gerlach et al. 1999).

Helicopter surveys of CO2 and H2S, the least susceptible to scrubbing of the more abundant magmatic gases, were carried out ~60 m above the area of ground swelling on 25 April and 21 September 2001. Readings of latitude/longitude by GPS receiver and measurements of CO2 and H2S concentrations, as well as air temperature and pressure, were recorded synchronously at 1-s intervals. A total of some 2500-3000 data points were collected for each variable. Both surveys showed H2S below detection limits (~5 ppb). The April survey showed possible trace levels of CO2 at ~1 ppm above atmospheric background (371-372.5 ppm) just downwind of the swelling center. The September survey showed only background atmospheric CO2 levels.

The surveys suggest very low rates of magma degassing and provide baselines for future airborne monitoring, should the inflation rate or other signs of unrest accelerate. If magma is accumulating at the inferred rate, the impact of degassed CO2 on atmospheric CO2 levels is apparently not significant. Perhaps degassed CO2 has not yet reached the surface; or if it has, it may be dispersed over a large area and masked by variations in background atmospheric CO2 levels; or most of it may be dissolved in subsurface water and carried off, or converted to HCO3- by water/rock reactions. Alternatively, magma may not be accumulating, and the ground swelling may reflect some other process.