PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ROCK CUT SLOPE DESIGN
Rock cuts made steeper than the controlling geologic structure allows may require expensive measures to maintain overall slope stability and wider fallout areas to contain increased rockfall. In addition, superimposing a steep cut slope on an existing slope configuration may result in thin (sliver) cuts. Often, sliver cuts pose impractical construction limitations such as difficult access to begin the cut and may be deemed unsafe to build because the narrow work area provides inadequate room for construction equipment.
When the geologic conditions affecting slope stability are favorable and constructibility is not a controlling factor, a steep cut (0.25H:1V or vertical) is generally preferred. It is important to note that changing the strike or dip of a cut slope by a few degrees may decrease slope performance by increasing the rockfall potential and the number of discontinuities adversely impacting the cut. This could require rockfall mitigation and protection measures, and increase design-life maintenance costs. In such cases, the economic advantages afforded by a steeper slope can be lost and a flatter, more stable slope (0.5H:1V or less) may be warranted.
Since there are no simple, universal rules that can be used to guarantee the performance of a rock cut slope, a thorough understanding of the controlling design factors is essential. It is important to have experienced rock slope design professionals investigate and evaluate the safest and most economical design, which best accommodates the site geology and project-specific constraints.