A COMPARISON OF GUIDED INQUIRY AND OPEN INQUIRY FIELD EXERCISES
Students state the problem, formulate the hypothesis, and develop their own working plan with open inquiry. A field exercise conducted at the confluence of Deer Creek and the Snake River near Montezuma Colorado is an example of open inquiry. At this site metal-rich, acidic waters mix with near neutral waters resulting in the precipitation of a white coating of aluminum hydroxides on the streambed. The only information the students are provided is a geologic and topographic map of the site. They are asked draw a sketch map and make observations. Based on their observations the students pose questions and develop a hypothesis. They are then provided a variety of field equipment that they can use to collect the data needed to test their hypothesis. Open inquiry is ineffective for teaching specific content because the content will depend on the aspect of the problem that the student chooses to investigate. However it is very effective in developing scientific process skills.
Guided- and open-inquiry exercises present different types of material, content rich versus process rich. Therefore, it is important that students experience a balanced mix of guided inquiry and open inquiry field exercises.